HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"count": 9318,
"next": "https://rsr.akvo.org/rest/v1/project_custom_field/?ordering=order&page=5",
"previous": "https://rsr.akvo.org/rest/v1/project_custom_field/?ordering=order&page=3",
"results": [
{
"id": 7734,
"name": "Project organisation",
"section": 3,
"max_characters": 0,
"help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7243
},
{
"id": 7736,
"name": "Budget narrative explanation",
"section": 6,
"max_characters": 0,
"help_text": "Narrative explanation.",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7243
},
{
"id": 7740,
"name": "Risks/Assumptions",
"section": 5,
"max_characters": 0,
"help_text": "What risks (foreseen and unforeseen) have affected the realisation of the project. What social risks exist and how do these affect women, men, and youth differently? What mitigation actions have been taken in the reporting year? Support received and/or still required? Challenges faced during reporting year Institutional aspects in Kenya: environmental influence, market failures, investment climate, etc <br />",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7244
},
{
"id": 7742,
"name": "Budget narrative explanation",
"section": 6,
"max_characters": 0,
"help_text": "Narrative explanation.",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7244
},
{
"id": 7743,
"name": "Project organisation",
"section": 3,
"max_characters": 0,
"help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7244
},
{
"id": 8162,
"name": "Risks/Assumptions",
"section": 5,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "What risks (foreseen and unforeseen) have affected the realisation of the project. What social risks exist and how do these affect women, men, and youth differently? What mitigation actions have been taken in the reporting year? Support received and/or still required? Challenges faced during reporting year Institutional aspects in Kenya: environmental influence, market failures, investment climate, etc \r\n",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7483
},
{
"id": 8163,
"name": "Project organisation",
"section": 3,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it ",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7483
},
{
"id": 8164,
"name": "Budget narrative explanation ",
"section": 6,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Narrative explanation.",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7483
},
{
"id": 8169,
"name": "Risks/Assumptions",
"section": 5,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "What risks (foreseen and unforeseen) have affected the realisation of the project. What social risks exist and how do these affect women, men, and youth differently? What mitigation actions have been taken in the reporting year? Support received and/or still required? Challenges faced during reporting year Institutional aspects in Kenya: environmental influence, market failures, investment climate, etc \r\n",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7489
},
{
"id": 8170,
"name": "Project organisation",
"section": 3,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it ",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7489
},
{
"id": 8171,
"name": "Budget narrative explanation ",
"section": 6,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Narrative explanation.",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7489
},
{
"id": 8176,
"name": "Risks/Assumptions",
"section": 5,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "What risks (foreseen and unforeseen) have affected the realisation of the project. What social risks exist and how do these affect women, men, and youth differently? What mitigation actions have been taken in the reporting year? Support received and/or still required? Challenges faced during reporting year Institutional aspects in Kenya: environmental influence, market failures, investment climate, etc \r\n",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7490
},
{
"id": 8177,
"name": "Project organisation",
"section": 3,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it ",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7490
},
{
"id": 8178,
"name": "Budget narrative explanation ",
"section": 6,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Narrative explanation.",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7490
},
{
"id": 8557,
"name": "Executive summary of the action",
"section": 1,
"max_characters": 0,
"help_text": "Please give a global overview of the Action’s implementation for the reporting period.\r\nReferring to the updated final logical framework matrix, describe the level of achievement of the outcome(s) on both the final beneficiaries &/or target group (if different) and the situation in the target country or target region which the Action addressed.\r\nPlease explain if the intervention logic has proved to be valid, including with the possible changes and their justifications presented in earlier reports, comment the likeliness of reaching the final target(s) related to the impact in a near future (specify);. \r\nPlease indicate any modification that have been brought to the Logframe matrix since the start of the Action and explain briefly why (complete explanation should be placed in the following section under the relevant level considered (outcomes, outputs, activities).\r\n",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7605
},
{
"id": 8647,
"name": "Executive summary of the action",
"section": 1,
"max_characters": 0,
"help_text": "Please give a global overview of the Action’s implementation for the reporting period.\r\nReferring to the updated final logical framework matrix, describe the level of achievement of the outcome(s) on both the final beneficiaries &/or target group (if different) and the situation in the target country or target region which the Action addressed.\r\nPlease explain if the intervention logic has proved to be valid, including with the possible changes and their justifications presented in earlier reports, comment the likeliness of reaching the final target(s) related to the impact in a near future (specify);. \r\nPlease indicate any modification that have been brought to the Logframe matrix since the start of the Action and explain briefly why (complete explanation should be placed in the following section under the relevant level considered (outcomes, outputs, activities).\r\n",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7618
},
{
"id": 8767,
"name": "Executive summary of the action",
"section": 1,
"max_characters": 0,
"help_text": "Please give a global overview of the Action’s implementation for the reporting period.\r\nReferring to the updated final logical framework matrix, describe the level of achievement of the outcome(s) on both the final beneficiaries &/or target group (if different) and the situation in the target country or target region which the Action addressed.\r\nPlease explain if the intervention logic has proved to be valid, including with the possible changes and their justifications presented in earlier reports, comment the likeliness of reaching the final target(s) related to the impact in a near future (specify);. \r\nPlease indicate any modification that have been brought to the Logframe matrix since the start of the Action and explain briefly why (complete explanation should be placed in the following section under the relevant level considered (outcomes, outputs, activities).\r\n",
"value": "In South Sudan, there is an urgent need to support schools with interventions for ensuring access to quality education and preventing school abandonment. \nThe target beneficiaries will be school-age children attending primary schools in South Sudan (aged 6-18), primary school teachers, school staff, Parent Teacher Associations (PTAs) and the education system in general. School meals help keep children in school during both emergencies and ongoing crises. Other key interventions to ensure access to quality education will include availability of adequate teaching materials and professional training to teachers, focusing on learning achievements. Emphasise will also be placed on the needs of the girl child (i.e. capacity building of teachers on GBV, gender sensitive toilet facilities and dignity kits) with the aim that schools provide a safe and supportive environment for boy and girl pupils alike. This intervention will target 75,000 students.",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7644
},
{
"id": 8782,
"name": "Executive summary of the action",
"section": 1,
"max_characters": 0,
"help_text": "Please give a global overview of the Action’s implementation for the reporting period.\r\nReferring to the updated final logical framework matrix, describe the level of achievement of the outcome(s) on both the final beneficiaries &/or target group (if different) and the situation in the target country or target region which the Action addressed.\r\nPlease explain if the intervention logic has proved to be valid, including with the possible changes and their justifications presented in earlier reports, comment the likeliness of reaching the final target(s) related to the impact in a near future (specify);. \r\nPlease indicate any modification that have been brought to the Logframe matrix since the start of the Action and explain briefly why (complete explanation should be placed in the following section under the relevant level considered (outcomes, outputs, activities).\r\n",
"value": "In South Sudan, there is an urgent need to support schools with interventions for ensuring access to quality education and preventing school abandonment. \nThe target beneficiaries will be school-age children attending primary schools in South Sudan (aged 6-18), primary school teachers, school staff, Parent Teacher Associations (PTAs) and the education system in general. School meals help keep children in school during both emergencies and ongoing crises. Other key interventions to ensure access to quality education will include availability of adequate teaching materials and professional training to teachers, focusing on learning achievements. Emphasise will also be placed on the needs of the girl child (i.e. capacity building of teachers on GBV, gender sensitive toilet facilities and dignity kits) with the aim that schools provide a safe and supportive environment for boy and girl pupils alike. This intervention will target 75,000 students.",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7645
},
{
"id": 8797,
"name": "Executive summary of the action",
"section": 1,
"max_characters": 0,
"help_text": "Please give a global overview of the Action’s implementation for the reporting period.\r\nReferring to the updated final logical framework matrix, describe the level of achievement of the outcome(s) on both the final beneficiaries &/or target group (if different) and the situation in the target country or target region which the Action addressed.\r\nPlease explain if the intervention logic has proved to be valid, including with the possible changes and their justifications presented in earlier reports, comment the likeliness of reaching the final target(s) related to the impact in a near future (specify);. \r\nPlease indicate any modification that have been brought to the Logframe matrix since the start of the Action and explain briefly why (complete explanation should be placed in the following section under the relevant level considered (outcomes, outputs, activities).\r\n",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7646
},
{
"id": 8878,
"name": "Risks/Assumptions",
"section": 5,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "What risks (foreseen and unforeseen) have affected the realisation of the project. What social risks exist and how do these affect women, men, and youth differently? What mitigation actions have been taken in the reporting year? Support received and/or still required? Challenges faced during reporting year Institutional aspects in Kenya: environmental influence, market failures, investment climate, etc \r\n",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7691
},
{
"id": 8879,
"name": "Project organisation",
"section": 3,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it ",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7691
},
{
"id": 8880,
"name": "Budget narrative explanation ",
"section": 6,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Narrative explanation.",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7691
},
{
"id": 8885,
"name": "Risks/Assumptions",
"section": 5,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "What risks (foreseen and unforeseen) have affected the realisation of the project. What social risks exist and how do these affect women, men, and youth differently? What mitigation actions have been taken in the reporting year? Support received and/or still required? Challenges faced during reporting year Institutional aspects in Kenya: environmental influence, market failures, investment climate, etc \r\n",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7692
},
{
"id": 8886,
"name": "Project organisation",
"section": 3,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it ",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7692
},
{
"id": 8887,
"name": "Budget narrative explanation ",
"section": 6,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Narrative explanation.",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7692
},
{
"id": 8907,
"name": "Risks/Assumptions",
"section": 5,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "What risks (foreseen and unforeseen) have affected the realisation of the project. What social risks exist and how do these affect women, men, and youth differently? What mitigation actions have been taken in the reporting year? Support received and/or still required? Challenges faced during reporting year Institutional aspects in Kenya: environmental influence, market failures, investment climate, etc \r\n",
"value": "Changement de politique de gouvernement/ Remise en cause de l’objectif de l’accès universel à l’eau potable en 2021\nNon-respect par le Gouvernement des règles de bonne gouvernance qu’il a lui-même adoptées \nPerte de confiance/collaboration entre les 3 ONGs de mise en œuvre\nChangement dans la composition des équipes des 3 ONGs\nFaible sensibilité des acteurs GIRE au genre et à la prise en compte des jeunes \nPeu d’importance accordée à la représentativité des acteurs au sein des organes à mettre en place",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7743
},
{
"id": 8908,
"name": "Project organisation",
"section": 3,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it ",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7743
},
{
"id": 8909,
"name": "Budget narrative explanation ",
"section": 6,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Narrative explanation.",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7743
},
{
"id": 8940,
"name": "Risks/Assumptions",
"section": 5,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "What risks (foreseen and unforeseen) have affected the realisation of the project. What social risks exist and how do these affect women, men, and youth differently? What mitigation actions have been taken in the reporting year? Support received and/or still required? Challenges faced during reporting year Institutional aspects in Kenya: environmental influence, market failures, investment climate, etc \r\n",
"value": "1. Risk - Delay in the approval of the integration policy by the house of representatives \nMigitation - Given the current favourable political economy situation of the country internally and externally (with neighbouring countries). This is most likely to go through but if this doesn’t happen or is delayed then it will affect the implementation of the programme. If delayed, we can still go on with internships which is possible. Exception maybe be granted for some refugee in collaboration with Netherlands Embassy to facilitate special permission from ARRA.\n2. Risk - Delay in importation of the machinery for the bucket manufacturing plant.\nMitigation : High support Tulip Addis to start the planning and importation process as soon as the agreement signed so that there is enough time. \n3. Risk - Government priority or strategy with regard to job compact lacking sector specific direction or policy.\t\nMitigation: This is to state that what the government have signed and agreed on job compact may not reach ground level and may not have directives for various sectors. That may hinder immediate action but this can be worked out through various means like close collaboration with ARRA.\n4 . Risk - The programme will have components that is not directly delivered by itself rather by private or government bodies. This means that impact is considered influenced and in some cases limited.\t\nMitigation : The pilot phase has to be careful while selecting partners to work with. \n5. Risk - Due to high risk of secondary migration Private sector may not be willing to offer fixed term employment for refugees integrated.\nMitigation : The selection of the refugees willing to join work force will be carefully selected with the support of the refugee community representative. With pilot practice and demonstration, private firm view will change. \n6. RISK - Tulip Addis pull out from the program \nMitigation: Tulip Addis has good track record with SNV IAP program. The due diligence done confirmed that the company is a well reputable with good financial standing to deliver the assignment. Plus there will be a close monitoring and support to ensure implementation according the agreement.",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7760
},
{
"id": 8941,
"name": "Project organisation",
"section": 3,
"max_characters": null,
"help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it ",
"value": "",
"mandatory": false,
"order": 1,
"type": "text",
"dropdown_options": null,
"dropdown_selection": null,
"project": 7760
}
]
}