GET /rest/v1/project_custom_field/?ordering=-section&page=10
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "count": 9318,
    "next": "https://rsr.akvo.org/rest/v1/project_custom_field/?ordering=-section&page=11",
    "previous": "https://rsr.akvo.org/rest/v1/project_custom_field/?ordering=-section&page=9",
    "results": [
        {
            "id": 92,
            "name": "Environmental sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 2 of the following questions: Are sustainable water sources used, e.g. rainwater or groundwater? If yes, how does this effect the ground water level? Will the project result in additional waste streams? If so, how are these dealt with? Is the project anticipating on future (predicted) effects of pollution and/or climate change on the water situation in the region (e.g. water availability and quality)?",
            "value": "The pumps are very sustainible and produces no CO2. Existing puts and boreholes are reused what is efficient and cost effective.\nIt is a closed watersystem so that the water produced is suitable as drinking water without any treatment. Water may be bottled from the pump for visitors so that no bottled water has to be transported from the city to the area.",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3880
        },
        {
            "id": 93,
            "name": "Technical sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 3 of the following questions: Is the technology choice appropriate for the local circumstances? Can the technology be locally manufactured? If not, can spare parts be obtained easily in case repairs or replacement is needed? Are the skills for operation and maintenance available or are trainings needed? If yes, what kind of trainings and for whom? Is the proposed technology affordable for local users, including costs of maintenance and replacement?",
            "value": "Both normal handpumps and diesel or electrical pumps in Mali are vulnurable. Most of them break down and are costly to maintain. The Blue Pump is developed for many years of intensive use in harsh conditions. The construction is simple and robust. If spare parts are available, maintenance can easily be done by local people. The Pump is in the private domain. That means that pump and spareparts have to be imported from the Netherlands. A truly sustainable pump can't yet be made locally",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 4,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3880
        },
        {
            "id": 94,
            "name": "Institutional sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 4 of the following questions: Is the ownership of the water facility clear? Who will be held responsible (person, community, water company or government) after the project period? How will they get sufficiently involved in the project to be able to take on this responsibility? Is it somebody's paid job to do operation and maintenance? Is there an organisation responsible for the quality control of the facility? Are all expected roles, tasks and responsibilities clearly defined and agreed? What about the gender balance in committees?",
            "value": "The project offers access to more and clean drinking water. This is a relief for women and children. The project fits in the social structure of the rural area and makes the local village communities entirely responsible for their own water supply. The project introduces education in entrepreneurship and creates sustainable local employment. The technics used are not complicated and can easily be learned at the local technical school. Without a good watersypply people will leave the rural area",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3880
        },
        {
            "id": 95,
            "name": "Financial sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 3 of the following questions: How are future operations & maintenance (incl. trainings, salaries and replacements) paid? Is budget set aside for this and who is the account holder? Who are paying: consumers, public sector or private investors? What local financial instruments are used: household contributions, recurrent tax revenues, fee systems, decentralized funds? Goal: make sure that the products/services can be delivered after the project period based on local revenues through one of the financial instruments.",
            "value": "The project is set up as an local enterprise and not to make profit. In the first 3 years it has to be arranged and therefore seed money is needed. After 3 to 5 years the enterprise can stand alone, independent of outside support and funding. At that stage the project offers employment for about 50 people. There is an market for at least 2000 pumps in Dogon and even more in Mali. So the employment can grow in the years after. By paying for the water the village generates income to maintain the pump",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3880
        },
        {
            "id": 98,
            "name": "Replication and scale",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Describe to what extent this project might lead to replication and/or up-scaling.",
            "value": "This model has been successfully replicated in various communities in the regency; scaling, however, is not expected to take place without external funding. ",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 6,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3884
        },
        {
            "id": 99,
            "name": "Social sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer the following questions: How strong is the demand/need for this water facility? Are needs of women, vulnerable groups and/or the poorest included in this project? Do they also play a role in capacity building? Is the project aligned with socio-cultural values and local customs?",
            "value": "System Socialisation and Institutional Aspects:\n- Training of the operation and maintenance system with BUMDES and community\n- Socialisation of the water supply and sanitation system to the community.\n\nDuring the project the village council, BUMDES and the involved community will be involved during decision making and installation activities.",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 5,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3884
        },
        {
            "id": 100,
            "name": "Technical sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 3 of the following questions: Is the technology choice appropriate for the local circumstances? Can the technology be locally manufactured? If not, can spare parts be obtained easily in case repairs or replacement is needed? Are the skills for operation and maintenance available or are trainings needed? If yes, what kind of trainings and for whom? Is the proposed technology affordable for local users, including costs of maintenance and replacement?",
            "value": "Inowa (now WLN) as WMD's local partner in Indonesia owned by WMD has a long track record in Indonesia. Planning and installation of water supply- and sanitation systems in Indonesia is common practice.\nWMDs local partmer will also be involved in inspections and control of maintenance, and maintain regular coordination with PU (kab Bandung Barat).",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 4,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3884
        },
        {
            "id": 101,
            "name": "Environmental sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 2 of the following questions: Are sustainable water sources used, e.g. rainwater or groundwater? If yes, how does this effect the ground water level? Will the project result in additional waste streams? If so, how are these dealt with? Is the project anticipating on future (predicted) effects of pollution and/or climate change on the water situation in the region (e.g. water availability and quality)?",
            "value": "The environment will not be negatively affected. The treatment system will use a filter system, no chemicals will be used. \nFor the additional infrastructure, and will be provided by the village. This will not negatively affect the environment in terms of consequences to drainage etc. \nThe volume of water taken from springs and rivers is relatively low and will not affect river discharge significantly.",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3884
        },
        {
            "id": 102,
            "name": "Institutional sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 4 of the following questions: Is the ownership of the water facility clear? Who will be held responsible (person, community, water company or government) after the project period? How will they get sufficiently involved in the project to be able to take on this responsibility? Is it somebody's paid job to do operation and maintenance? Is there an organisation responsible for the quality control of the facility? Are all expected roles, tasks and responsibilities clearly defined and agreed? What about the gender balance in committees?",
            "value": "Operation and maintenance will be the responsibility of BUMDES, supported if necessary by WMDs local partner in Bandung and the water & sanitation agency of the local government.\nOwnership will be with the local governement. The infrastructure will be officially handed over.",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3884
        },
        {
            "id": 104,
            "name": "Financial sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 3 of the following questions: How are future operations & maintenance (incl. trainings, salaries and replacements) paid? Is budget set aside for this and who is the account holder? Who are paying: consumers, public sector or private investors? What local financial instruments are used: household contributions, recurrent tax revenues, fee systems, decentralized funds? Goal: make sure that the products/services can be delivered after the project period based on local revenues through one of the financial instruments.",
            "value": "By monthly contribution of the users to BUMDES.\n\nThe local counterpart of WMD will assist BUMDES in setting up an operation & maintenance schedule, calculation of the fee, the socialisation to the community and the implementation of a simple but strong billing procedure. The fee depends on the depreciation costs of the system, and the total operational costs, which differs between the existing and the new service area.-",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3884
        },
        {
            "id": 106,
            "name": "Technical sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 3 of the following questions: Is the technology choice appropriate for the local circumstances? Can the technology be locally manufactured? If not, can spare parts be obtained easily in case repairs or replacement is needed? Are the skills for operation and maintenance available or are trainings needed? If yes, what kind of trainings and for whom? Is the proposed technology affordable for local users, including costs of maintenance and replacement?",
            "value": " ",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 4,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3893
        },
        {
            "id": 107,
            "name": "Social sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer the following questions: How strong is the demand/need for this water facility? Are needs of women, vulnerable groups and/or the poorest included in this project? Do they also play a role in capacity building? Is the project aligned with socio-cultural values and local customs?",
            "value": " ",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 5,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3893
        },
        {
            "id": 108,
            "name": "Replication and scale",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Describe to what extent this project might lead to replication and/or up-scaling.",
            "value": "Risk 1: National conflict worsens, impacting operations \nMitigation:  Implementation by local partners and staff can reduce impact  \n\nRisk 2: No/ limited access by expatriate personnel to country or project site \nMitigation: Yemen programme has been remotely managed since January 2015. Whilst this has limitations and challenges, the programme remains operational\n\nRisk 3: Shortage of fuel and procurement items \nMitigation: Negotiate with suppliers in and out of country",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 6,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3893
        },
        {
            "id": 109,
            "name": "Institutional sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 4 of the following questions: Is the ownership of the water facility clear? Who will be held responsible (person, community, water company or government) after the project period? How will they get sufficiently involved in the project to be able to take on this responsibility? Is it somebody's paid job to do operation and maintenance? Is there an organisation responsible for the quality control of the facility? Are all expected roles, tasks and responsibilities clearly defined and agreed? What about the gender balance in committees?",
            "value": " ",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3893
        },
        {
            "id": 110,
            "name": "Environmental sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 2 of the following questions: Are sustainable water sources used, e.g. rainwater or groundwater? If yes, how does this effect the ground water level? Will the project result in additional waste streams? If so, how are these dealt with? Is the project anticipating on future (predicted) effects of pollution and/or climate change on the water situation in the region (e.g. water availability and quality)?",
            "value": " ",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3893
        },
        {
            "id": 111,
            "name": "Financial sustainability",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 600,
            "help_text": "Try to answer at least 3 of the following questions: How are future operations & maintenance (incl. trainings, salaries and replacements) paid? Is budget set aside for this and who is the account holder? Who are paying: consumers, public sector or private investors? What local financial instruments are used: household contributions, recurrent tax revenues, fee systems, decentralized funds? Goal: make sure that the products/services can be delivered after the project period based on local revenues through one of the financial instruments.",
            "value": " ",
            "mandatory": true,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 3893
        },
        {
            "id": 5464,
            "name": "project_plan_summary",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "",
            "value": "General Description\nWe have to get the next five years right, if we’re to meet the target of universal access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) by 2030. Watershed will take up the challenge by putting lobby and advocacy as one of the key pillars to achieve faster results. Watershed is a strategic partnership between the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and IRC, Simavi, Wetlands International and Akvo. Sustainability of WASH services is a critical Watershed goal. Over the next five years, the Watershed strategic partnership will deliver improvements in the governance and management of water, sanitation and hygiene services as well as of the water resources on which they draw. Good WASH governance requires the active and meaningful involvement of users (particularly women) of WASH services, service providers, water resource users and polluters. A strong civil society is essential to ensure that the voices of users are heard by service providers and government, and that government, service providers and the private sector are effectively held to account. The programme will be active at international level and in six countries: Kenya, Uganda, Mali, Ghana, Bangladesh, India. What we want to see: • Proven interventions funnelling knowledge and lessons upwards to influence governance and policy at national, regional and international levels. • Global civil society demanding fulfilment of the right to water and sanitation and equitable, sustainable allocation of water resources. • New partners investing in other countries based on Watershed results and approach. • International donors integrating environmental sustainability and climate change resilience into their WASH frameworks and practices. Simavi will be active at international level and Dutch level and in Kenya, Uganda, Ghana and Bangladesh.\n\nObjectives Description\nLong-term objective: ‘improved governance of the WASH sector, responsive to the interests of marginalised groups’. Overall outcomes: 1 In the countries where we work: competent CSOs and their networks lobby effectively for the realisation of the human right to water and sanitation and the reduction of inequalities in access to WASH/IWRM services. 2 Communities and citizens become capacitated and organise to demand their rights to water and sanitation and participate in WASH planning and budgeting. 3 In the global WASH/IWRM arena: global civil society effectively demands fulfilment of the human right to water and sanitation and equitable and sustainable allocation of water resources.\n\nTarget Groups Description\nThe ultimate target group for which we want improvements are the marginalised or people at risk of being marginalised in WASH governance: the poor; people who are excluded by reason of ethnicity or caste; and those who are hardest to reach due to location. The Watershed programme will work through strengthening civil society organization and governments.",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 0,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 6400
        },
        {
            "id": 5465,
            "name": "project_plan_summary",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "",
            "value": "General Description\nWe have to get the next five years right, if we’re to meet the target of universal access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) by 2030. Watershed will take up the challenge by putting lobby and advocacy as one of the key pillars to achieve faster results. Watershed is a strategic partnership between the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and IRC, Simavi, Wetlands International and Akvo. Sustainability of WASH services is a critical Watershed goal. Over the next five years, the Watershed strategic partnership will deliver improvements in the governance and management of water, sanitation and hygiene services as well as of the water resources on which they draw. Good WASH governance requires the active and meaningful involvement of users (particularly women) of WASH services, service providers, water resource users and polluters. A strong civil society is essential to ensure that the voices of users are heard by service providers and government, and that government, service providers and the private sector are effectively held to account. The programme will be active at international level and in six countries: Kenya, Uganda, Mali, Ghana, Bangladesh, India. What we want to see: • Proven interventions funnelling knowledge and lessons upwards to influence governance and policy at national, regional and international levels. • Global civil society demanding fulfilment of the right to water and sanitation and equitable, sustainable allocation of water resources. • New partners investing in other countries based on Watershed results and approach. • International donors integrating environmental sustainability and climate change resilience into their WASH frameworks and practices. Simavi will be active at international level and Dutch level and in Kenya, Uganda, Ghana and Bangladesh.\n\nObjectives Description\nLong-term objective: ‘improved governance of the WASH sector, responsive to the interests of marginalised groups’. Overall outcomes: 1 In the countries where we work: competent CSOs and their networks lobby effectively for the realisation of the human right to water and sanitation and the reduction of inequalities in access to WASH/IWRM services. 2 Communities and citizens become capacitated and organise to demand their rights to water and sanitation and participate in WASH planning and budgeting. 3 In the global WASH/IWRM arena: global civil society effectively demands fulfilment of the human right to water and sanitation and equitable and sustainable allocation of water resources.\n\nTarget Groups Description\nThe ultimate target group for which we want improvements are the marginalised or people at risk of being marginalised in WASH governance: the poor; people who are excluded by reason of ethnicity or caste; and those who are hardest to reach due to location. The Watershed programme will work through strengthening civil society organization and governments.",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 0,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 6401
        },
        {
            "id": 5466,
            "name": "project_plan_summary",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "",
            "value": "General Description\nWe have to get the next five years right, if we’re to meet the target of universal access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) by 2030. Watershed will take up the challenge by putting lobby and advocacy as one of the key pillars to achieve faster results. Watershed is a strategic partnership between the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and IRC, Simavi, Wetlands International and Akvo. Sustainability of WASH services is a critical Watershed goal. Over the next five years, the Watershed strategic partnership will deliver improvements in the governance and management of water, sanitation and hygiene services as well as of the water resources on which they draw. Good WASH governance requires the active and meaningful involvement of users (particularly women) of WASH services, service providers, water resource users and polluters. A strong civil society is essential to ensure that the voices of users are heard by service providers and government, and that government, service providers and the private sector are effectively held to account. The programme will be active at international level and in six countries: Kenya, Uganda, Mali, Ghana, Bangladesh, India. What we want to see: • Proven interventions funnelling knowledge and lessons upwards to influence governance and policy at national, regional and international levels. • Global civil society demanding fulfilment of the right to water and sanitation and equitable, sustainable allocation of water resources. • New partners investing in other countries based on Watershed results and approach. • International donors integrating environmental sustainability and climate change resilience into their WASH frameworks and practices. Simavi will be active at international level and Dutch level and in Kenya, Uganda, Ghana and Bangladesh.\n\nObjectives Description\nLong-term objective: ‘improved governance of the WASH sector, responsive to the interests of marginalised groups’. Overall outcomes: 1 In the countries where we work: competent CSOs and their networks lobby effectively for the realisation of the human right to water and sanitation and the reduction of inequalities in access to WASH/IWRM services. 2 Communities and citizens become capacitated and organise to demand their rights to water and sanitation and participate in WASH planning and budgeting. 3 In the global WASH/IWRM arena: global civil society effectively demands fulfilment of the human right to water and sanitation and equitable and sustainable allocation of water resources.\n\nTarget Groups Description\nThe ultimate target group for which we want improvements are the marginalised or people at risk of being marginalised in WASH governance: the poor; people who are excluded by reason of ethnicity or caste; and those who are hardest to reach due to location. The Watershed programme will work through strengthening civil society organization and governments.",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 0,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 6402
        },
        {
            "id": 5467,
            "name": "project_plan_summary",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "",
            "value": "General Description\nWe have to get the next five years right, if we’re to meet the target of universal access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) by 2030. Watershed will take up the challenge by putting lobby and advocacy as one of the key pillars to achieve faster results. Watershed is a strategic partnership between the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and IRC, Simavi, Wetlands International and Akvo. Sustainability of WASH services is a critical Watershed goal. Over the next five years, the Watershed strategic partnership will deliver improvements in the governance and management of water, sanitation and hygiene services as well as of the water resources on which they draw. Good WASH governance requires the active and meaningful involvement of users (particularly women) of WASH services, service providers, water resource users and polluters. A strong civil society is essential to ensure that the voices of users are heard by service providers and government, and that government, service providers and the private sector are effectively held to account. The programme will be active at international level and in six countries: Kenya, Uganda, Mali, Ghana, Bangladesh, India. What we want to see: • Proven interventions funnelling knowledge and lessons upwards to influence governance and policy at national, regional and international levels. • Global civil society demanding fulfilment of the right to water and sanitation and equitable, sustainable allocation of water resources. • New partners investing in other countries based on Watershed results and approach. • International donors integrating environmental sustainability and climate change resilience into their WASH frameworks and practices. Simavi will be active at international level and Dutch level and in Kenya, Uganda, Ghana and Bangladesh.\n\nObjectives Description\nLong-term objective: ‘improved governance of the WASH sector, responsive to the interests of marginalised groups’. Overall outcomes: 1 In the countries where we work: competent CSOs and their networks lobby effectively for the realisation of the human right to water and sanitation and the reduction of inequalities in access to WASH/IWRM services. 2 Communities and citizens become capacitated and organise to demand their rights to water and sanitation and participate in WASH planning and budgeting. 3 In the global WASH/IWRM arena: global civil society effectively demands fulfilment of the human right to water and sanitation and equitable and sustainable allocation of water resources.\n\nTarget Groups Description\nThe ultimate target group for which we want improvements are the marginalised or people at risk of being marginalised in WASH governance: the poor; people who are excluded by reason of ethnicity or caste; and those who are hardest to reach due to location. The Watershed programme will work through strengthening civil society organization and governments.",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 0,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 6403
        },
        {
            "id": 5468,
            "name": "project_plan_summary",
            "section": 4,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "",
            "value": "General Description\nWe have to get the next five years right, if we’re to meet the target of universal access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) by 2030. Watershed will take up the challenge by putting lobby and advocacy as one of the key pillars to achieve faster results. Watershed is a strategic partnership between the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and IRC, Simavi, Wetlands International and Akvo. Sustainability of WASH services is a critical Watershed goal. Over the next five years, the Watershed strategic partnership will deliver improvements in the governance and management of water, sanitation and hygiene services as well as of the water resources on which they draw. Good WASH governance requires the active and meaningful involvement of users (particularly women) of WASH services, service providers, water resource users and polluters. A strong civil society is essential to ensure that the voices of users are heard by service providers and government, and that government, service providers and the private sector are effectively held to account. The programme will be active at international level and in six countries: Kenya, Uganda, Mali, Ghana, Bangladesh, India. What we want to see: • Proven interventions funnelling knowledge and lessons upwards to influence governance and policy at national, regional and international levels. • Global civil society demanding fulfilment of the right to water and sanitation and equitable, sustainable allocation of water resources. • New partners investing in other countries based on Watershed results and approach. • International donors integrating environmental sustainability and climate change resilience into their WASH frameworks and practices. Simavi will be active at international level and Dutch level and in Kenya, Uganda, Ghana and Bangladesh.\n\nObjectives Description\nLong-term objective: ‘improved governance of the WASH sector, responsive to the interests of marginalised groups’. Overall outcomes: 1 In the countries where we work: competent CSOs and their networks lobby effectively for the realisation of the human right to water and sanitation and the reduction of inequalities in access to WASH/IWRM services. 2 Communities and citizens become capacitated and organise to demand their rights to water and sanitation and participate in WASH planning and budgeting. 3 In the global WASH/IWRM arena: global civil society effectively demands fulfilment of the human right to water and sanitation and equitable and sustainable allocation of water resources.\n\nTarget Groups Description\nThe ultimate target group for which we want improvements are the marginalised or people at risk of being marginalised in WASH governance: the poor; people who are excluded by reason of ethnicity or caste; and those who are hardest to reach due to location. The Watershed programme will work through strengthening civil society organization and governments.",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 0,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 6404
        },
        {
            "id": 273,
            "name": "Project organisation",
            "section": 3,
            "max_characters": null,
            "help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it ",
            "value": "Even though we have seen progress in hunger reduction globally, chronic household food security remains a challenge. It is estimated that around 795 million people are undernourished, with the majority living in developing countries. \n\nAround 500 million smallholder farmers produce 70% of the world’s food, and it is estimated that agriculture accounts for 40% of the world’s employment, with women contributing up to 60% of the labour for food production. Yet despite their contribution, women continue to be marginalised in household decision-making around income and asset distribution, and gain few of the benefits of land ownership. The real threat of climate change and extreme weather conditions, such as floods and droughts, has the greatest impact on people who rely on agriculture for their livelihoods.Progress in tackling these issues was made in 2015, with world leaders and the global community at large continuing to set agriculture high on the political agenda. This commitment was emphasised through the agreement of the Sustainable Development Goals, and the adoption by 195 countries of the first universal climate agreement at COP21",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 2602
        },
        {
            "id": 810,
            "name": "Project organisation",
            "section": 3,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it",
            "value": "",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 6003
        },
        {
            "id": 825,
            "name": "Project organisation",
            "section": 3,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it",
            "value": "",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 6024
        },
        {
            "id": 994,
            "name": "Project organisation",
            "section": 3,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it",
            "value": "",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 6211
        },
        {
            "id": 7026,
            "name": "Project organisation",
            "section": 3,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it",
            "value": "",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 7018
        },
        {
            "id": 7033,
            "name": "Project organisation",
            "section": 3,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it",
            "value": "",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 7019
        },
        {
            "id": 7040,
            "name": "Project organisation",
            "section": 3,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it",
            "value": "",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 7020
        },
        {
            "id": 7051,
            "name": "Project organisation",
            "section": 3,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it",
            "value": "",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 7021
        },
        {
            "id": 7535,
            "name": "Project organisation",
            "section": 3,
            "max_characters": 0,
            "help_text": "Mention important realisations and changes compared to proposal and annual plan, Functioning M & E system (or novelties). Justification of deviations + how to make up for it",
            "value": "",
            "mandatory": false,
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "dropdown_options": null,
            "dropdown_selection": null,
            "project": 7175
        }
    ]
}