NL-KVK-41201644-10355 Wemos Foundation Make Way Rwanda context - Wemos Make Way - embracing intersectionality for health equity & justice. The Make Way programme (2021-2025) aims to ensure youth in all their diversity can fully realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). We promote an intersectional approach to addressing SRHR issues. This means making overlapping vulnerabilities visible to understand their effects on people’s SRHR. We develop innovative tools and build capacities of other civil society organisations to advocate the needed policy and societal changes. Our partnership consists of Akina Mama wa Afrika, The Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians, Kenya, Forum for African Women Educationalists, Liliane Foundation, VSO Netherlands, and Wemos, and we work in partnership with the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. We implement Make Way in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, the Eastern and Southern African region and at the global level. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Akvo Foundation Wemos Renée Bouhuijs PMEL coordinator renee.bouhuijs@wemos.nl Ellermanstraat 15-O, 1114 AK Amsterdam-Duivendrecht, The Netherlands -1.940278 29.873888 131669.00 191233.00 123949.00 181888.00 73763.00 825379.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Rwanda, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 121048.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Rwanda in 2021 178054.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Rwanda in 2022 214977.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Rwanda in 2023 200219.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Rwanda in 2024 Initiatives: any gathering aiming to advocate for intersectional SRHR, that CCG or CP has organised or participated in. Create space: to speak out for inclusive SRHR for YwCVs. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Links with MFA SCS 3: **SCS032 - # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at sub-national level** In 2021 the CCG was set up and the CPs were selected. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. Total value is 20 for the consortium. Based on new stakeholders/duty bearers. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. ​ This indicator counts only **YOUTH LED CSO.** A CSO will be counted if it is trained accordingly: - with customised training materials - that at least 1 staff member of the CSO attended - pre and post test is done Reporting for MFA is annually and on ++unique ++values (so only counting each CP (youth-led) once, over time). Links with MFA SRH022 - # of youth led CSOs with increased L&A capacities In 2021 the collaborating partners include 2 youth-led and 6 non youth/non woman led organisations. Youth led organisation is an organisation that is predominantly staffed and or governed by youth The coordinating consortium partner organisation for this context will be reporting on the actual value over 2021 16-12-2022: All consortium partner & 8 collaborating partners participated in the co-creation workshop, in which the topic of intersectionality and intersectional L&A was introduced. Materials for intersectional LA were developed in 2021, to start conduction trainings in 2022. In 2021, 1 awareness session was given on Disability inclusive SRHR to the CCG and CPS. Also an initial training was given on Social Inclusion and Gender to 8 CPs and consortium members, as part of a series to fulfill this indicator. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. 19-04-2024: Capacity Strengthening of collaborating partners and consortium partners continued. No specific trainings for new CSO were given. The Make Way Consortium is planning to engage a youth network through which youth led organisations will be identified and trained. 28-04-2025: In 2024, we ended up not engaging new youth led organisations. However, Afriyan which is a network of around 20 organisations was still engaged for follow ups, further engagements were made as they played a key role in the High level youth-led meeting as part of international Youth day celebration. The final year will focus on sustainability. There are no new CSO to be trained. We do anticipate spill over effect from trained collaborating partners and trained allies. This indicator counts only **NOT YOUTH LED or WOMAN LED CSO.** A CSO will be counted if it is trained accordingly: - with customised training materials - that at least 1 staff member of the CSO attended - pre and post test is done Reporting for MFA is annually and on unique values (so only counting each CP (not youth or women led) once, over time). Links with MFA SRH023 - # of CSOs (not youth or women led) with increased L&A capacities In 2021 the collaborating partners include 2 youth-led and 6 non youth/non woman led organisations. Youth led organisation is an organisation that is predominantly staffed and or governed by youth The coordinating consortium partner organisation for this context will be reporting on the actual value over 2021 16-12-2022: All consortium partner & 8 collaborating partners participated in the co-creation workshop, in which the topic of intersectionality and intersectional L&A was introduced. Materials for intersectional LA were developed in 2021, to start conduction trainings in 2022. In 2021, 1 awareness session was given on Disability inclusive SRHR to the CCG and CPS. Also an initial training was given on Social Inclusion and Gender to 8 CPs and consortium members, as part of a series to fulfill this indicator. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. The CSO allies are to be identified. All CPs will be involved in training of the CSO Allies. Workplan 2023 activity: Identify and bring together CPs allies for intersectional movement building ;workshop session on the criteria’s of organization to bring on board. Target is set under the context lead organisation. 19-04-2024: Capacity Strengthening of collaborating partners and consortium partners continued. No specific trainings for new CSO were given. Through the Intersectional coalition which is still in the establishment process in 2023, more CSOs will be trained around intersectionality L&A. The final year will focus on sustainability. There are no new CSO to be trained. We do anticipate spill over effect from trained collaborating partners and trained allies. Count activities at **(inter)national level** under the **L&A objective** which include youth involved in : - Initiate/Organising activities themselves. - Active engagement from the inception to the implementation and follow up. - and or Intential selection of youth. - Documentation of the youth issues. Clear role of youth in the process. MFA Explains it as : - how CSOs activate and educate citizens, - how they mobilise support and create networks, - and how this culminates in political participation of excluded or marginalised groups. ++With/by youth with compounded vulnerabilities++: Active engagement from the inception to the implementation and follow up. For national and international level advocacy initiatives by CSO allies linked to **SCS041 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency** Current status is that experiences on the field show that young people are often excluded or overlooked as political actors. Young people are systematically marginalised within political spaces due to their young age, perceived lack of experience and limited opportunities to be engaged. (_Engaging youth in building an equal and inclusive society. Never Again Rwanda. “Inzira Nziza Activity” 2019.)_ Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. ​ Count activities at **subnational **under the **L&A objective** which include youth involved in : - Initiate/Organising activities themselves. - Active engagement from the inception to the implementation and follow up. - and or Intential selection of youth. - Documentation of the youth issues. Clear role of youth in the process. MFA Explains it as : - how CSOs activate and educate citizens, - how they mobilise support and create networks, - and how this culminates in political participation of excluded or marginalised groups. ++With/by youth with compounded vulnerabilities++: Active engagement from the inception to the implementation and follow up. **Links with MFA** **SCS042 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level** Current status is that experiences on the field show that young people are often excluded or overlooked as political actors. Young people are systematically marginalised within political spaces due to their young age, perceived lack of experience and limited opportunities to be engaged. (_Engaging youth in building an equal and inclusive society. Never Again Rwanda. “Inzira Nziza Activity” 2019.)_ Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). (this was the old MTSO 4 but has been merged with MTSO 3) Technically easiest way to merge. Only count advocacy activities** at national level **related to sexual harassment/safe guarding policies in schools, higher institutions & in workplaces. MFA Explains it as : - how CSOs activate and educate citizens, - how they mobilise support and create networks, - and how this culminates in political participation of excluded or marginalised groups. Links to SCS041: # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency Rwanda’s 2015 DHS8 revealed that 25.3% of women aged 20-24 had experienced sexual violence; and that 4% of women aged 15-19 had experienced sexual violence in the last 12 months prior to the survey. In addition, 28% of women aged 20-24 and 24% of women aged 15-19 have experienced physical violence since age 15. The Violence Against Children and Youth Survey (VACYS) 2015-20169 showed that 12% of females and 5% of males aged 13-17 had experienced sexual abuse in the 12 months prior to the survey. This survey also showed that in children aged 13-17 34% of both females and males had first experienced sexual abuse at or before the age 13. Women with disabilities are two to four times more likely to experience partner violence than those without disabilities. Furthermore, the risk of experiencing all forms of partner violence and non-partner sexual violence increases with the severity of impairment. Qualitative data shows that disability-related stigma and discrimination, compounds women’s vulnerability to violence and hinders their ability to seek help. 10 By the end of year 3, youth with compounded vulnerabilities will be more visible and active in advocacy efforts for their SRHR, speaking out confidently and well-informed on their rights, and in particular, as relates to sexual abuse and exploitation. There will also be a strong focus on raising the awareness of and informing a wide range of actors on discriminatory practices towards youth with compounded vulnerabilities and on tackling biases and socio-cultural norms. Advocacy at this point is highly strategic and involves a broader set of actors, to include CSO allies and communities of young people in safe spaces, beyond the youth panel and youth groups affiliated with our collaborating partners. Real change starts to be seen in improvement in school and institutional policies. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). 17-01-2024: In 2022: Specific baseline data has been collected to address this indicator. By the end of year 3, youth with compounded vulnerabilities will be more visible and active in advocacy efforts for their SRHR, speaking out confidently and well-informed on their rights, and in particular, as relates to sexual abuse and exploitation. There will also be a strong focus on raising the awareness of and informing a wide range of actors on discriminatory practices towards youth with compounded vulnerabilities and on tackling biases and socio-cultural norms. Advocacy at this point is highly strategic and involves a broader set of actors, to include CSO allies and communities of young people in safe spaces, beyond the youth panel and youth groups affiliated with our collaborating partners. Real change starts to be seen in improvement in school and institutional policies. In 2023: Activities planned are: Training of school's heads on safeguarding and sexual exploitation policy. Meeting with each district education officer to speak about safeguarding policies. So far 2 schools have been active. The 2 clubs have conduct an activity every month. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Only count advocacy activities** at sub national level **related to sexual harassment/safe guarding policies in schools, higher institutions & in workplaces.MFA Explains it as : - how CSOs activate and educate citizens, - how they mobilise support and create networks, - and how this culminates in political participation of excluded or marginalised groups. Links to SCS041: # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency Rwanda’s 2015 DHS8 revealed that 25.3% of women aged 20-24 had experienced sexual violence; and that 4% of women aged 15-19 had experienced sexual violence in the last 12 months prior to the survey. In addition, 28% of women aged 20-24 and 24% of women aged 15-19 have experienced physical violence since age 15. The Violence Against Children and Youth Survey (VACYS) 2015-20169 showed that 12% of females and 5% of males aged 13-17 had experienced sexual abuse in the 12 months prior to the survey. This survey also showed that in children aged 13-17 34% of both females and males had first experienced sexual abuse at or before the age 13. Women with disabilities are two to four times more likely to experience partner violence than those without disabilities. Furthermore, the risk of experiencing all forms of partner violence and non-partner sexual violence increases with the severity of impairment. Qualitative data shows that disability-related stigma and discrimination, compounds women’s vulnerability to violence and hinders their ability to seek help. 10 By the end of year 3, youth with compounded vulnerabilities will be more visible and active in advocacy efforts for their SRHR, speaking out confidently and well-informed on their rights, and in particular, as relates to sexual abuse and exploitation. There will also be a strong focus on raising the awareness of and informing a wide range of actors on discriminatory practices towards youth with compounded vulnerabilities and on tackling biases and socio-cultural norms. Advocacy at this point is highly strategic and involves a broader set of actors, to include CSO allies and communities of young people in safe spaces, beyond the youth panel and youth groups affiliated with our collaborating partners. Real change starts to be seen in improvement in school and institutional policies. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). 17-01-2024: In 2022: Specific baseline data has been collected to address this indicator. By the end of year 3, youth with compounded vulnerabilities will be more visible and active in advocacy efforts for their SRHR, speaking out confidently and well-informed on their rights, and in particular, as relates to sexual abuse and exploitation. There will also be a strong focus on raising the awareness of and informing a wide range of actors on discriminatory practices towards youth with compounded vulnerabilities and on tackling biases and socio-cultural norms. Advocacy at this point is highly strategic and involves a broader set of actors, to include CSO allies and communities of young people in safe spaces, beyond the youth panel and youth groups affiliated with our collaborating partners. Real change starts to be seen in improvement in school and institutional policies. In 2023: Activities planned are: Training of school's heads on safeguarding and sexual exploitation policy. Meeting with each district education officer to speak about safeguarding policies. So far 2 schools have been active. The 2 clubs have conduct an activity every month. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Count: - number of policies that are updated, reformulated and adjusted. **Reviewed**: updated, adjusted, reformulated as a result of youth advocacy. Links SRH016 # of governmental policies blocked, adopted, improved leading to decrease of barriers to SRHR and HIV/AIDS services Current status is that experiences on the field show that young people are often excluded or overlooked as political actors. Young people are systematically marginalised within political spaces due to their young age, perceived lack of experience and limited opportunities to be engaged. (_Engaging youth in building an equal and inclusive society. Never Again Rwanda. “Inzira Nziza Activity” 2019.)_ Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). 16-12-2022: Status update 2021: Actual value is 0. Policies and strategic plans have been identified, more details for effective L&A is being collected in 2022. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Only count advocacy actions led by youth, which include one of the 3 elements: - changes decision making processes and policy - frames introduced by CSOs - reach the agenda **Led by youth:** Engaging youth from the start of any initiative to where they are equal partners and decision makers in the activity. Links to: SCS032: # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at sub-national level Current status is that experiences on the field show that young people are often excluded or overlooked as political actors. Young people are systematically marginalised within political spaces due to their young age, perceived lack of experience and limited opportunities to be engaged. (_Engaging youth in building an equal and inclusive society. Never Again Rwanda. “Inzira Nziza Activity” 2019.)_ _Baseline comment: On the question are you leading any advocacy action the response was (n=250) No: 92.8% and 7.2% yes. _ Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). 17-01-2024: In 2022: The set up of youth panel and the creation of safe spaces is one step made to engage youth with compounded vulnerabilities. In 2023: At Subnational level youth with compounded vulnerabilities led advocacy initiatives through Community score card. So far we had 3rounds of ICSC which would target around 20 youth with different vulnerabilities. These activities will be through the youth panel and through partners of the Make Way Alliance in Rwanda. The activities will be through the iCSC and the Safe Spaces developed targeting various duty bearers. Results will be achieved as an alliance together. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Count: at ++national level ++ - the number of advocacy initiatives co-implemented with Make Way collaborating partners and or CSO allies. **With 'CSO allies' we mean: **CCG & collaborating partners with at least with 2 likeminded organisations. Links to SCS041: # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency (at the national level) Baseline value was 0 as the programme was setting up. n.a The activities under these targets are related to the Lobby and Advocacy plan developed by the Rwanda Make Way alliance. Results will be achieved as an alliance. n.a Count: at ++sub-national++ level - the number of advocacy initiatives co-implemented with Make Way collaborating partners and or CSO allies. **With 'CSO allies' we mean: **CCG & collaborating partners with at least with 2 likeminded organisations. Links to SCS042: # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency (at the sub-national level) Baseline value was 0 as the programme was setting up. Baseline to be set in 2023. The activities under these targets are related to the Lobby and Advocacy plan developed by the Rwanda Make Way alliance. Results will be achieved as an alliance. Baseline to be set in 2023. Only count the moments that Make Way CCG/CPs or allies are invited to participate. To reach the following: - changes decision making processes and policy - frames introduced by CSOs - reach the agenda **By 'Participate' we mean:** be at the meeting and feel that you have contributed. - …explaining how CSO involvement changes decision making processes and policy discussions of targeted government, private sector and societal actors - …explaining how and what frames introduced by CSOs are taken up by targeted actors, for instance by the media, in policy documents and in official speeches - …explaining how and what CSO issues reach the agenda of targeted government, private sector and societal actors Links to MFA indicator SCS031 : # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level. The legal framework for CSOs in Rwanda is multi-faceted, as different laws regulate the activities of NGOs (national and international) and other kinds of citizens’ collective actions and organisations. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). NL-KVK-41201644-10350 Wemos Foundation Make Way Ethiopia context - Wemos Make Way - embracing intersectionality for health equity & justice. The Make Way programme (2021-2025) aims to ensure youth in all their diversity can fully realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). We promote an intersectional approach to addressing SRHR issues. This means making overlapping vulnerabilities visible to understand their effects on people’s SRHR. We develop innovative tools and build capacities of other civil society organisations to advocate the needed policy and societal changes. Our partnership consists of Akina Mama wa Afrika, The Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians, Kenya, Forum for African Women Educationalists, Liliane Foundation, VSO Netherlands, and Wemos, and we work in partnership with the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. We implement Make Way in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, the Eastern and Southern African region and at the global level. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Akvo Foundation Wemos Renée Bouhuijs PMEL Coordinator renee.bouhuijs@wemos.nl Ellermanstraat 15-O, 1114 AK Amsterdam-Duivendrecht, The Netherlands 9.145000000000001 40.489673 131669.00 191233.00 123949.00 181888.00 73763.00 825383.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Ethiopia, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 121048.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Ethiopia in 2021 166511.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Ethiopia in 2022 214977.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Ethiopia in 2023 200219.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Ethiopia in 2024 Report on the number of youth led CSOs (including consortium partners, Make Way collaborating partners and youth panel) trained on intersectional lobby and advocacy. ​ Links to MFA SRHR indicator J: SRH022 # of youth led CSOs with increased L&A capacities ​ 16-12-2022: No CSO was trained in 2021. The first year of the programme (2021) was used to recruit our collaborating partners. In the same year, the six (6) collaborating partners chosen saw their lobby and advocacy capacities (viz. issue analysis; goal setting; movement and coalition; stakeholder mapping; advocacy planning; communication; implementation). The findings were then used to inform an advocacy capacity building plan which has seen its implementation started in 2022, and will be continued in 2023. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. All collaborating partners have started to receive capacity strengthening training on intersectional L&A in 2022. For 2023 we do not foresee to train new CSOs, but we will continue our capacity strengthening efforts for our current collaborating partners. 29-04-2024: Although no new partners were trained on intersectional lobby and advocacy during the year, the Make Way in Ethiopia continued to support the team through more sessions of trainings on the topic of intersectional lobby and advocacy to refresh and add new insights. 30-04-2025: Although no new partners were trained on intersectional lobby and advocacy during the year, Make Way Ethiopia continued to support the team: FAWE and a CP conducted a training 20-22 March with 30 young people from Adama and Addis Ababa to deepen their skills on intersectional SRHR advocacy and meaningful youth participation in policy and decision-making. On 30 November, a youth panellist led an intersectional advocacy workshop using the Make Way MYE Tool with 26 Adolescent and Youth Councils from Addis Ababa operating at regional and national levels. The session oriented participants on how to operationalise meaningful youth engagement in their structures and highlighted how the findings of the ICSC could contribute to advocacy. Participants agreed to push for young people’s rights to SRH services regardless of their identity. Report on the number of (not youth or women led) CSOs (including consortium partners, Make Way collaborating partners and youth panel) trained on intersectional lobby and advocacy. ​ Links to MFA SRHR indicator J: SRH023 # of CSOs (not youth or women led) with increased L&A capacities ​ ​ 16-12-2022: No CSO was trained in 2021. The first year of the programme (2021) was used to recruit our collaborating partners. In the same year, the six (6) collaborating partners chosen saw their lobby and advocacy capacities (viz. issue analysis; goal setting; movement and coalition; stakeholder mapping; advocacy planning; communication; implementation). The findings were then used to inform an advocacy capacity building plan which has seen its implementation started in 2022, and will be continued in 2023. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. All collaborating partners have started to receive capacity strengthening training on intersectional L&A in 2022. For 2023 we do not foresee to train new CSOs, but we will continue our capacity strengthening efforts for our current collaborating partners. 29-04-2024: Although no new partners were trained on intersectional lobby and advocacy during the year, the Make Way in Ethiopia continued to support the team through more sessions of trainings on the topic of intersectional lobby and advocacy to refresh and add new insights. 30-04-2025: Although no new partners were trained on intersectional lobby and advocacy during the year, Make Way Ethiopia continued to support the team: FAWE and a CP conducted a training 20-22 March with 30 young people from Adama and Addis Ababa to deepen their skills on intersectional SRHR advocacy and meaningful youth participation in policy and decision-making. On 30 November, a youth panellist led an intersectional advocacy workshop using the Make Way MYE Tool with 26 Adolescent and Youth Councils from Addis Ababa operating at regional and national levels. The session oriented participants on how to operationalise meaningful youth engagement in their structures and highlighted how the findings of the ICSC could contribute to advocacy. Participants agreed to push for young people’s rights to SRH services regardless of their identity. For this mid-term outcome, we're using the following definitions: - 'a coordinated and harmonised manner': by working together - 'common structure': through a coordination unit where they are working together, e.g. a network Report on the number of joint advocacy initiatives made by the CCG Ethiopia, MW collaborating partners, MW CSO allies and youth leaders representing a coalition. [**other than sub-national level**] We define 'joint advocacy initiatives' as follows: at least 2 members participate in the initiative (e.g. a joint publication or position paper). In order to count this indicator, at least 2 members need to participate in an initiative. ​ Count 3 x Unique - (target, MT actual, ET actual). Count national level initiatives. ​ Links to SCS4: - SCS041: # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency ​ Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Report on the number of joint advocacy initiatives made by the CCG Ethiopia, MW collaborating partners, MW CSO allies and youth leaders representing a coalition. [**at sub-national level**] We define 'joint advocacy initiatives' as follows: at least 2 members participate in the initiative (e.g. a joint publication or position paper). In order to count this indicator, at least 2 members need to participate in an initiative. ​ Count 3 x Unique - (target, MT actual, ET actual). Count sub-national level initiatives. ​ Links to SCS4: - SCS042 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency **at sub-national level** ​ Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). MTR: _This sub outcome is made specific to focus on increase in funds allocation for SRH services for marginalized youth_ Report on the number of calls through which positive changes in funding structures and policies on SRHR for marginalised youth are advocated ++at other than sub-national level.++ Reporting is unique. With 'calls' we mean: participated in meetings/forums to appeal to the government, with the aim of agenda setting and influencing their debate(s). ​ Links to MFA basket indicator SCS4: SCS041 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency ​ Reporting to MFA is at baseline, midline, and end-line. Report unique values, i.e. every unique call or meeting will be counted. ​ Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Report on the number of calls through which positive changes in funding structures and policies on SRHR for marginalised youth are advocated ++at sub-national level.++ Reporting is unique. With 'calls' we mean: participated in meetings/forums to appeal to the government, with the aim of agenda setting and influencing their debate(s). With 'funding structure and policies on SRHR' we mean: xx ​ Links to MFA basket indicator SCS4: SCS042 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level ​ Reporting to MFA is at baseline, midline, and end-line. Report unique values, i.e. every unique call or meeting will be counted. ​ Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Report on number of times Make Way consortium partners, collaborating partners and/or CSO allies are present and on the agenda with their issues, of the meetings of duty bearers at national and international level. Duty bearers: 1. Police/law enforcement officers 2. Health workers 3. Community leaders Committed: Based on the views of youth on how the duty bearers are providing services and respecting their rights. Based on the current policies in place at the different duty bearers. ​ Count unique values (counting only once) at mid-term and end-term. ​ Links to MFA SCS3: SCS031: # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Report on number of times Make Way consortium partners, collaborating partners and/or CSO allies are present and on the agenda with their issues, of the meetings of duty bearers at sub-national level. Duty bearers: 1. Police/law enforcement officers 2. Health workers 3. Community leaders Committed: Based on the views of youth on how the duty bearers are providing services and respecting their rights. Based on the current policies in place at the different duty bearers. ​ Count unique values (counting only once) at mid-term and end-term. ​ Links to MFA SCS3: SCS032: # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at sub-national level ​ Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). This indicator tracks the number of minoritised youth i.e youth with disabilities, sex workers, girls, LGBTQI+, etc. who report that their voices are accounted for in the planning, implementation and monitoring of SRHR-related activities. With 'voices' we mean: input as a result of youth participation in decision-making discussions regarding SRHR. ​ Report annually, on reach values. ​ Links with SRHR indicator A: **SRH002f - # of youth (female) who participate in policy and decision-making bodies who perceive their participation as meaningful** ​ ​ 16-12-2022: In Ethiopia, in 2021 the Make Way programme was set up and programmatic structures were consolidated. The Make Way project agreement with the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health was signed on June 3, 2022. The implementation of activities in line with our ToC commenced in 2022. The targets for this long-term indicator will be set in 2023 and will be based on the programmatic progress made until mid-term. Baseline to be set in 2023. Make Way Ethiopia started its implementation only in the second half of 2022. We foresee to focus on capacity building starting in 2023. 29-04-2024: In 2023, we conducted a baseline survey with youth attached to the consortium and collaborating partners of the Make Way programme. Out of 318 marginalised young people, only 16.6% reported that their views were incorporated in the planning, monitoring, and evaluation of SRHR-related activities. Our programme aims to continuously involve and put young people at the centre of SRHR lobby and advocacy. This is already happening in the case of the ICSC roll-out. In 2025, we aim to conduct a survey again to assess any potential increase or decrease in the indicator. TBD in 2023 30-04-2025: As a follow-up to the baseline survey that was done in 2023, among youth attached to the consortium and collaborating partners of the Make Way programme, this indicator will be assessed in May 2025. The Ethiopian CCG is developing a tool to carry out a survey to ascertain whether this indicator is being met. Back when the baseline was conducted, the CCG planned to have the assessment take place in 2025 - accounting for both 2024 and 2025. The reach target value for 2024 was included as the youth were engaged in that year (same as for 2025) but measuring the indicator will take place in 2025. This indicator tracks the number of minoritised youth i.e youth with disabilities, sex workers, girls, LGBTQI+, etc. who report that their voices are accounted for in the planning, implementation and monitoring of SRHR-related activities. With 'voices' we mean: input as a result of youth participation in decision-making discussions regarding SRHR. ​ Report annually, on reach values. ​ Links with SRHR indicator A: **SRH002m - # of youth (male) who participate in policy and decision-making bodies who perceive their participation as meaningful** ​ ​ 16-12-2022: In Ethiopia, in 2021 the Make Way programme was set up and programmatic structures were consolidated. The Make Way project agreement with the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health was signed on June 3, 2022. The implementation of activities in line with our ToC commenced in 2022. The targets for this long-term indicator will be set in 2023 and will be based on the programmatic progress made until mid-term. Baseline to be set in 2023. Make Way Ethiopia started its implementation only in the second half of 2022. We foresee to focus on capacity building starting in 2023. 29-04-2024: In 2023, we conducted a baseline survey with youth attached to the consortium and collaborating partners of the Make Way programme. Out of 318 marginalised young people, only 16.6% reported that their views were incorporated in the planning, monitoring, and evaluation of SRHR-related activities. Our programme aims to continuously involve and put young people at the centre of SRHR lobby and advocacy. This is already happening in the case of the ICSC roll-out. In 2025, we aim to conduct a survey again to assess any potential increase or decrease in the indicator. TBD in 2023. 30-04-2025: As a follow-up to the baseline survey that was done in 2023, among youth attached to the consortium and collaborating partners of the Make Way programme, this indicator will be assessed in May 2025. The Ethiopian CCG is developing a tool to carry out a survey to ascertain whether this indicator is being met. Back when the baseline was conducted, the CCG planned to have the assessment take place in 2025 - accounting for both 2024 and 2025. The reach target value for 2024 was included as the youth were engaged in that year (same as for 2025) but measuring the indicator will take place in 2025. This indicator tracks the number of minoritised youth i.e youth with disabilities, sex workers, girls, LGBTQI+, etc. who report that their voices are accounted for in the planning, implementation and monitoring of SRHR-related activities. With 'voices' we mean: input as a result of youth participation in decision-making discussions regarding SRHR. ​ Report annually, on reach values. ​ Links with SRHR indicator A: **SRH002x - # of youth (other) who participate in policy and decision-making bodies who perceive their participation as meaningful** ​ ​ 16-12-2022: In Ethiopia, in 2021 the Make Way programme was set up and programmatic structures were consolidated. The Make Way project agreement with the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health was signed on June 3, 2022. The implementation of activities in line with our ToC commenced in 2022. The targets for this long-term indicator will be set in 2023 and will be based on the programmatic progress made until mid-term. Baseline to be set in 2023. Make Way Ethiopia started its implementation only in the second half of 2022. We foresee to focus on capacity building starting in 2023. 29-04-2024: In 2023, we conducted a baseline survey with youth attached to the consortium and collaborating partners of the Make Way programme. Out of 318 marginalised young people, only 16.6% reported that their views were incorporated in the planning, monitoring, and evaluation of SRHR-related activities. Our programme aims to continuously involve and put young people at the centre of SRHR lobby and advocacy. This is already happening in the case of the ICSC roll-out. In 2025, we aim to conduct a survey again to assess any potential increase or decrease in the indicator. TBD in 2023. 30-04-2025: As a follow-up to the baseline survey that was done in 2023, among youth attached to the consortium and collaborating partners of the Make Way programme, this indicator will be assessed in May 2025. The Ethiopian CCG is developing a tool to carry out a survey to ascertain whether this indicator is being met. Back when the baseline was conducted, the CCG planned to have the assessment take place in 2025 - accounting for both 2024 and 2025. The reach target value for 2024 was included as the youth were engaged in that year (same as for 2025) but measuring the indicator will take place in 2025. TBD in 2024. This indicator tracks the number of minoritised youth i.e youth with disabilities, sex workers, girls, LGBTQI+, etc. who report that their voices are accounted for in the planning, implementation and monitoring of SRHR-related activities. With 'voices' we mean: input as a result of youth participation in decision-making discussions regarding SRHR. ​ Report annually, on reach values. ​ Links with SRHR indicator A: **SRH002 - # of youth (gender not-specified) who participate in policy and decision-making bodies who perceive their participation as meaningful** ​ ​ 16-12-2022: In Ethiopia, in 2021 the Make Way programme was set up and programmatic structures were consolidated. The Make Way project agreement with the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health was signed on June 3, 2022. The implementation of activities in line with our ToC commenced in 2022. The targets for this long-term indicator will be set in 2023 and will be based on the programmatic progress made until mid-term. Baseline to be set in 2023. Make Way Ethiopia started its implementation only in the second half of 2022. We foresee to focus on capacity building starting in 2023. 29-04-2024: In 2023, we conducted a baseline survey with youth attached to the consortium and collaborating partners of the Make Way programme. Out of 318 marginalised young people, only 16.6% reported that their views were incorporated in the planning, monitoring, and evaluation of SRHR-related activities. Our programme aims to continuously involve and put young people at the centre of SRHR lobby and advocacy. This is already happening in the case of the ICSC roll-out. In 2025, we aim to conduct a survey again to assess any potential increase or decrease in the indicator. TBD in 2023 30-04-2025: As a follow-up to the baseline survey that was done in 2023, among youth attached to the consortium and collaborating partners of the Make Way programme, this indicator will be assessed in May 2025. The Ethiopian CCG is developing a tool to carry out a survey to ascertain whether this indicator is being met. Back when the baseline was conducted, the CCG planned to have the assessment take place in 2025 - accounting for both 2024 and 2025. The reach target value for 2024 was included as the youth were engaged in that year (same as for 2025) but measuring the indicator will take place in 2025. NL-KVK-41201644-10347 Wemos Foundation Make Way Kenya context - Wemos Make Way - embracing intersectionality for health equity & justice. The Make Way programme (2021-2025) aims to ensure youth in all their diversity can fully realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). We promote an intersectional approach to addressing SRHR issues. This means making overlapping vulnerabilities visible to understand their effects on people’s SRHR. We develop innovative tools and build capacities of other civil society organisations to advocate the needed policy and societal changes. Our partnership consists of Akina Mama wa Afrika, The Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians, Kenya, Forum for African Women Educationalists, Liliane Foundation, VSO Netherlands, and Wemos, and we work in partnership with the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. We implement Make Way in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, the Eastern and Southern African region and at the global level. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Akvo Foundation Wemos Renée Bouhuijs PMEL Coordinator renee.bouhuijs@wemos.nl Ellermanstraat 15-O, 1114 AK Amsterdam-Duivendrecht, The Netherlands -0.023559 37.906193 131669.00 191233.00 95949.00 181888.00 73763.00 825379.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Kenya, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 121048.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Kenya in 2021 166511.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Kenya in 2022 214977.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Kenya in 2023 200219.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Kenya in 2024 With 'meaningful youth participation' we mean: Youth are involved in the design, planning, implementation, monitoring, decision-making and learning of the programme. Count the number of MYP meetings attended by either consortium partners, collaborating partners, and/or youth panelist. ​ Count unique values (counting only once) at mid-term and end-term. ​ MYP Forums/meetings: External physical or virtual platforms, avenues, and discussions in for open discussions on intersectional SRHR issues that engage youth in a meaningful way. ​ Links with: SCS031 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Count the number of MYP meetings attended by either consortium partners, collaborating partners, and/or youth panelist. ​ Count unique values (counting only once) at mid-term and end-term. ​ MYP Forums/meetings: External physical or virtual platforms, avenues, and discussions in for open discussions on intersectional SRHR issues that engage youth in a meaningful way. ​ Links with: SCS032 - # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at sub-national level ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Trainings related to \*\*SRHR L&A\*\* include: - Intersectional SRHR Feminism Advocacy Training - ISJA Training - Intersectional Budget Analysis Workshop ​ Count the number of CSOs that are youth-led. Count unique values (counting only once). ​ Links with: **SRH022 - # of youth led CSOs with increased L&A capacities** ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Make Way Kenya has reached its capacity building targets of 2022. In 2023 we do not foresee training ++new++ CSOs, but instead we will focus on strengthening the capacity of the partners we have worked with in 2022. 18-04-2024: No new CSO was trained in YR3, but refresh trainings to support the ongoing advoacy work were given to previously trained CSOs. We do not foresee to train new CSOs as of now. We will continue to build the capacity of our collaborating partners and CSO allies (who have already been trained and therefore counted). Should any CSOs in the Kenyan context express interest in joining our alliance, they will likely be trained on intersectional advocacy and Make Way tools and be counted here. Trainings related to \*\*SRHR L&A\*\* include: - Intersectional SRHR Feminism Advocacy Training - ISJA Training - Intersectional Budget Analysis Workshop ​ Count the number of CSOs that are not youth or women led. Count unique values (counting only once). ​ Links with: **SRH023 - # of CSOs (not youth or women led) with increased L&A capacities** ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Make Way Kenya has reached its capacity building targets of 2022. In 2023 we do not foresee training ++new++ CSOs, but instead we will focus on strengthening the capacity of the partners we have worked with in 2022. 18-04-2024: No new CSO was trained in YR3, but refresh trainings to support the ongoing advoacy work were given to previously trained CSOs. We do not foresee to train new CSOs as of now. We will continue to build the capacity of our collaborating partners and CSO allies (who have already been trained and therefore counted). Should any CSOs in the Kenyan context express interest in joining our alliance, they will likely be trained on intersectional advocacy and Make Way tools and be counted here. With 'active engagement' we mean: Engaging based on knowledge of budget analysis skills and monitoring the budget for SRH Count the number of national-level advocacy initiatives organised by consortium partners, collaborating partners, CSO allies and youth panel demanding the improvement of resource allocation for SRHR. ​ _Advocacy initiatives_ include actions that speak for, or favour, the improvement of intersectional SRHR budgets. These include, but are not limited to: social & media campaigns, public campaigns, peaceful protests, picketing, meeting with duty bearers, community sensitisation. _Improved_ means Increase of - or better - allocation of resources for SRHR. _SRHR_ budgets must be understood broadly, i.e., including health and subcategory RMNCAH. ​ Links with: **SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency** ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Count the number of county-level advocacy initiatives organised by consortium partners, collaborating partners, CSO allies and youth panel demanding the improvement of resource allocation for SRHR ​ _Advocacy initiatives_ include actions that speak for, or favour, the improvement of intersectional SRHR budgets. These include, but are not limited to: social & media campaigns, public campaigns, peaceful protests, picketing, meeting with duty bearers, community sensitisation. _Improved_ means Increase of - or better - allocation of resources for SRHR. _SRHR_ budgets must be understood broadly, i.e., including health and subcategory RMNCAH. ​ Links with: **SCS042 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level** Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). ​ Count the number of national-level advocacy initiatives aimed at the promoting the application of an intersectional lens in key SRHR policies affecting youth (and countering opposition) ​ Links with:** SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency.** MFA: 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Count the number of county-level advocacy initiatives aimed at promoting the application of an intersectional lens in key SRHR policies affecting youth (and countering opposition) ​ Links with: **SCS042 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level.** Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Count the number of national-level advocacy initiatives that target the strengthening of health workers' capacity on intersectionality to increase AAAQ of SRH services. ​ _Health care workers_ include service providers (nurses, doctors, specialists), employees working at the facilities (administration, security, etc), duty bearers (such as elected officials and bureaucrats) - that is, **all actors that are involved and influence the delivery of AAAQ SRH services**. ​ Links with: **SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency.** Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Count the number of county-level advocacy initiatives that target the strengthening of health workers' capacity on intersectionality to increase AAAQ of SRH services. ​ _Health care workers_ include service providers (nurses, doctors, specialists), employees working at the facilities (administration, security, etc), duty bearers (such as elected officials and bureaucrats) - that is, **all actors that are involved and influence the delivery of AAAQ SRH services. ** ​ Links with: **SCS042 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level** Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). ​ Count the number of national-level advocacy initiatives that are not specifically targeting key SRHR policies and laws, SRHR budgets, and SRH service delivery. ​ Links with: **SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency.** ​ Baseline to be established in 2023, when the CSO allies are on board. TBD in 2023. Baseline to be established in 2023, when the CSO allies are on board. Baseline to be established in 2023, when the CSO allies are on board. Count the number of county-level advocacy initiatives that are not specifically targeting key SRHR policies and laws, SRHR budgets, and SRH service delivery. ​ Links with: SCS042 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level ​ Baseline to be established in 2023, when the CSO allies are on board. TBD in 2023. Baseline to be established in 2023, when the CSO allies are on board. Baseline to be established in 2023, when the CSO allies are on board. Count meetings, unique values (counting only once) at mid-term and end-term. Count meetings held at (inter)national level. ​ Meetings: any type of meeting where policy/programmes/laws are being discussed and being formed by duty bearers Data: Qualitative and quantitative data gathered based on stakeholder’s voices and using structured tools and/or research (e.g., social accountability tools) Informed decision making: data gathered above is collected, analysed and disseminated in a participatory process to guide decisions around SRHR policies, guidelines, implementation ​ Links with: SCS031 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Count meetings, unique values (counting only once) at mid-term and end-term. Count meetings held at sub-national level. ​ Meetings: any type of meeting where policy/programmes/laws are being discussed and being formed by duty bearers Data: Qualitative and quantitative data gathered based on stakeholder’s voices and using structured tools and/or research (e.g., social accountability tools) Informed decision making: data gathered above is collected, analysed and disseminated in a participatory process to guide decisions around SRHR policies, guidelines, implementation ​ Links with: SCS032 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at sub-national level Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Remove of the word donor, since we do not focus on donors any longer. Count number of times, unique values (counting only once) at mid-term and end-term. Count number of times present and on the agenda with our issues, during meetings at (inter)national level. ​ Links with: SCS031 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Count number of times, unique values (counting only once) at mid-term and end-term. Count number of times present and on the agenda with our issues, during meetings at sub-national level. ​ Links with: SCS032 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at sub-national level ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). NL-KVK-41201644-10338 Wemos Foundation Make Way Zambia context - Wemos Make Way - embracing intersectionality for health equity & justice. The Make Way programme (2021-2025) aims to ensure youth in all their diversity can fully realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). We promote an intersectional approach to addressing SRHR issues. This means making overlapping vulnerabilities visible to understand their effects on people’s SRHR. We develop innovative tools and build capacities of other civil society organisations to advocate the needed policy and societal changes. Our partnership consists of Akina Mama wa Afrika, The Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians, Kenya, Forum for African Women Educationalists, Liliane Foundation, VSO Netherlands, and Wemos, and we work in partnership with the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. We implement Make Way in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, the Eastern and Southern African region and at the global level. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Akvo Foundation Wemos Renée Bouhuijs PMEL Coordinator renee.bouhuijs@wemos.nl Ellermanstraat 15-O, 1114 AK Amsterdam-Duivendrecht, The Netherlands -13.133897 27.849332 131669.00 191233.00 95949.00 181888.00 73763.00 825378.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Zambia, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 121048.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Zambia in 2021 166511.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Zambia in 2022 214977.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Zambia in 2023 200219.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Zambia in 2024 Count CSOs (youth-led) that have policies or strategies revised and are including an intersectional lens to SRHR. ​ Adapt: this also includes adopting (taking over) and adjusting this to their needs if necessary. ​ Reporting for MFA is annual and on reach (so counting the total number of CPs reached, over time). ​ Links with: SCS082 - # of youth led CSOs using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth At baseline, CCG Zambia had selected 11 Make Way CPs in total. Internal trainings on elements of Intersectional SRHR Lobby and Advocacy as well as programming in ongoing. The development of a comprehensive toolkit to guide the intersectionality is ongoing. Targeted assessments are planned to support the working strategies in intersectional SRHR programming for adoption. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Count CSOs (not youth or women led) that have policies or strategies revised and are including an intersectional lens to SRHR. Adapt: this also includes adopting (taking over) and adjusting this to their needs if necessary. ​ Reporting for MFA is annual and on reach (so counting the total number of CPs reached, over time). ​ Links with: SCS083 - # of CSOs (not youth led or women led) using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth. At baseline, CCG Zambia had selected 11 Make Way CPs in total. Internal trainings on elements of Intersectional SRHR Lobby and Advocacy as well as programming in ongoing. The development of a comprehensive toolkit to guide the intersectionality is ongoing. Targeted assessments are planned to support the working strategies in intersectional SRHR programming for adoption. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. ​ Report on the number of MW collaborating partners that implemented their capacity development plans, based on the organisational L&A capacity assessments that were undertaken in 2021. Define implemented: training conducted, learning demonstrated, activities implemented, signs of change. ​ Reporting for MFA is annually and on unique values (so only counting each CP (youth-led) once, over time). ​ Links with MFA SRHR J: **SRH022 - # of youth led CSOs with increased L&A capacities** The CPs' intersectional Lobby and Advocacy capacity has been assessed. Though the CPs have L&A capacity, their approaches are not fully intersectional and some have weaknesses in key elements e.g. safeguarding, youth engagement, gender equity and disability focus as well as experience with regional advocacy. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. We do not foresee to train new CSOs for 2025. We will continue to build the capacity of our collaborating partners (who have already been trained and therefore counted). Report on the number of MW collaborating partners that implemented their capacity development plans, based on the organisational L&A capacity assessments that were undertaken in 2021. Define implemented: training conducted, learning demonstrated, activities implemented, signs of change. ​ Reporting for MFA is annually and on unique values (so only counting each CP (not youth or women led) once, over time). ​ Links with MFA SRHR J: **SRH023 - # of CSOs (not youth or women led) with increased L&A capacities** The CPs' intersectional Lobby and Advocacy capacity has been assessed. Though the CPs have L&A capacity, their approaches are not fully intersectional and some have weaknesses in key elements e.g. safeguarding, youth engagement, gender equity and disability focus as well as experience with regional advocacy. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. We do not foresee to train new CSOs for 2025. We will continue to build the capacity of our collaborating partners (who have already been trained and therefore counted). Report on the number of awareness and/or capacity building initiatives on intersectional SRHR that were carried out at (inter)national level, with which duty bearers were targeted. In the comments section, describe which duty bearers were targeted this reporting period. ​ 'Awareness activities': xxx 'Capacity building': xxx ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links with MFA SCS 4: **SCS041 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency** Right now, some organisations working in the SRHR space use a piecemeal approach, thereby excluding those most in need especially those with compounded vulnerabilities. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Report on the number of awareness and/or capacity building initiatives on intersectional SRHR that were carried out at sub-national level, with which duty bearers were targeted. In the comments section, describe which duty bearers were targeted this reporting period. ​ 'Awareness activities': xxx 'Capacity building': xxx ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links with MFA SCS 4: **SCS042 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level** Right now, some organisations working in the SRHR space use a piecemeal approach, thereby excluding those most in need especially those with compounded vulnerabilities. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Report on the number of L&A initiatives that are jointly executed. Jointly executed: initiatives carried out in alliances that were established before (at the short-term) ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links with MFA SCS 4: **SCS041 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency** Right now, the consortium and collaborating partners execute SRHR activities independently or with very limited collaboration. In addition, most of such activities leave out those with compounded vulnerabilities. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Report on the number of **youth-led** CPs, CSO allies, other partners and the CCG Zambia that are using the materials from the Make Way toolkit. ​ 'Use materials': xxx 'Materials': content of the toolkit. ​ Reporting annually, on reach values, of youth-led CSOs, for each reporting period (i.e. the total reach of the unit of measurement). ​ Links with MFA SCS 8: - **SCS082 # of youth led CSOs using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth.** There is no standardised and comprehensive toolkit to guide intersectional SRHR advocacy processes. A technical working group has been constituted to drive the process of developing such toolkit. The consortium partners have the capacity to come up with the required toolkit. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. ​ Report on the number of **not youth or women led** CPs, CSO allies, other partners and the CCG Zambia that are using the materials from the Make Way toolkit. ​ 'Use materials': xxx 'Materials': content of the toolkit. ​ Reporting annually, on reach values, of not youth or women led CSOs, for each reporting period (i.e. the total reach of the unit of measurement). ​ Links with MFA SCS 8: - SCS083 # of CSOs (not youth led or women led) using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth. There is no standardised and comprehensive toolkit to guide intersectional SRHR advocacy processes. A technical working group has been constituted to drive the process of developing such toolkit. The consortium partners have the capacity to come up with the required toolkit. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Report on the number of L&A initiatives that are jointly executed. Jointly executed: initiatives carried out in alliances that were established before (at the short-term) ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links with MFA SCS 4: **SCS042 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level** Right now, the consortium and collaborating partners execute SRHR activities independently or with very limited collaboration. In addition, most of such activities leave out those with compounded vulnerabilities. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Report on the number of initiatives, at sub-national level, carried out by MW collaborating partners and CSO allies, by using social accountability tools to hold duty-bearers accountable. ​ Community structures: community clubs/action groups that push for community policy through social accountability mechanisms (as agreed). Can be both formal and informal structures. ​ Report on unique values (any other unit of measurement is counted just once), and report to MFA at BL, ML, and EL. ​ Links with MFA: SCS042 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level. The duty bearers are currently actioning policies and programmes at will. There are limited social accountability frameworks. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). This is a number of laws promoting access to intersectional SRHR for marginalised youth. ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Provide qualitative information to the progress on this indicator annually. ​ Links with: SRH015 # of laws blocked, adopted, improved leading to decrease of barriers to SRHR and HIV/AIDS services SRHR policy documents exist. However, they are neither intersectional nor fully inclusive. Situational analysis has been conducted and some SRHR related policies identified to guide the intervention. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). This is a number of governmental policies promoting access to intersectional SRHR for marginalised youth. ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Provide qualitative information to the progress on this indicator annually. ​ Links with: SRH016 # of governmental policies blocked, adopted, improved leading to decrease of barriers to SRHR and HIV/AIDS services SRHR policy documents exist. However, they are neither intersectional nor fully inclusive. Situational analysis has been conducted and some SRHR related policies identified to guide the intervention. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Count the number of youth led L&A activities, at sub-national level, carried out on intersectional SRHR issues. ​ This is about vulnerable and marginalised youth speaking out freely regarding intersectional SRHR especially for the marginalised and the vulnerable. ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links with MFA SCS 4: **SCS042 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level** Young people have access to uncontrolled SRHR info. There is fear of having conversations about SRHR with the parents and care givers. The drive within the young people to demand for SRHR access is still low. The situation is worse among the marginalised youth with compounded vulnerabilities. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Count the activities organised **at sub-national level**, by MW COs and MW CSO allies, targeting SRH services. ​ Activities: awareness raising, campaigns, etc. Services: AAAQ SRH services ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links with MFA SCS 3: **SCS032 - # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at sub-national level** ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). NL-KVK-41201644-10335 Wemos Foundation Make Way Uganda context - Wemos Make Way - embracing intersectionality for health equity & justice. The Make Way programme (2021-2025) aims to ensure youth in all their diversity can fully realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). We promote an intersectional approach to addressing SRHR issues. This means making overlapping vulnerabilities visible to understand their effects on people’s SRHR. We develop innovative tools and build capacities of other civil society organisations to advocate the needed policy and societal changes. Our partnership consists of Akina Mama wa Afrika, The Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians, Kenya, Forum for African Women Educationalists, Liliane Foundation, VSO Netherlands, and Wemos, and we work in partnership with the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. We implement Make Way in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, the Eastern and Southern African region and at the global level. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Akvo Foundation Wemos Renée Bouhuijs PMEL Coordinator renee.bouhuijs@wemos.nl Ellermanstraat 15-O, 1114 AK Amsterdam-Duivendrecht, The Netherlands 1.373333 32.290275 131669.00 191233.00 95949.00 181888.00 73763.00 825383.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Uganda, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 121048.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Uganda in 2021 167243.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Uganda in 2022 214977.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Uganda in 2023 200219.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Uganda in 2024 ​ The CP can be counted (when 'unique', so when not counted in the previous period): 1. at least 2 staff have attended the MW capacity building engagements and have the capacity to implement intersectional SRHR advocacy initiatives. 2. the CP has conducted a L&A capacity assessment. 3. the CP has undertaken the self-and peer assessment value clarification on intersectionality. ​ Reporting annually, on unique values, for youth-led collaborating partners. ​ If relevant, attach a reference doc. for the above (attendance list/training reports/assessment results). ​ Links with SRHR indicator J: **SRH022 - # of youth led CSOs with increased L&A capacities** In 2021, collaborating partners assessed their capacity and knowledge to self organise and help scale up intersectionality advocacy approaches for SRHR. Technical capacity gaps were identified within the collaborating partners' organisations that may hinder their ability to conduct intersectional SRHR advocacy. These gaps are to be bridged through the various trainings organised for collaborating partners' staff. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. The CP can be counted (when 'unique', so when not counted in the previous period): 1. at least 2 staff have attended the MW capacity building engagements and have the capacity to implement intersectional SRHR advocacy initiatives. 2. the CP has conducted a L&A capacity assessment. 3. the CP has undertaken the self-and peer assessment value clarification on intersectionality. ​ Reporting annually, on unique values, for not youth- or women-led collaborating partners. ​ If relevant, attach a reference doc. for the above (attendance list/training reports/assessment results). ​ Links with SRHR indicator J: **SRH023 - # of CSOs (not youth or women led) with increased L&A capacities** In 2021, collaborating partners assessed their capacity and knowledge to self organise and help scale up intersectionality advocacy approaches for SRHR. Technical capacity gaps were identified within the collaborating partners' organisations that may hinder their ability to conduct intersectional SRHR advocacy. These gaps are to be bridged through the various trainings organised for collaborating partners' staff. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. ​ Only count CSO Allies: - that, based on the interaction/collaboration/ideas of the CSO CPs, are adopting intersectional SRHR in their work and - that have an SRHR advocacy strategy including intersectionality. ​ Reporting annually, on reach values, of youth-led CSO allies. ​ Links with MFA SCS 8: - **SCS082 # of youth led CSOs using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth.** The programme baseline value is zero because the concept of intersectionality in SRHR had not yet spread to other CSOs other than the consortium partners and collaborating partners. ​ The target for 2022 is still zero because a lot of effort is geared towards building the capacity of collaborating partners to understand the programme to be able to reach out to other CSOs (allies) with the same concept in 2023. Hence we expect CSO allies to adopt intersectionality in 2023. TBD in 2023. The target for 2022 is still zero because a lot of effort is geared towards building the capacity of collaborating partners to understand the programme to be able to reach out to other CSOs (allies) with the same concept in 2023. Hence we expect CSO allies to adopt intersectionality in 2023. Count all the CSO, both Make Way Collaborating partners and Allies that have an advocacy agenda. This means concrete: - activities planned - budgeted - linked to a timeframe A CSO (collaborating partner or ally) will be counted if they have at least 2 activities planned for and/or implemented targeting SRHR of minoritised youth. ​ Reporting annually, on reach values, of youth-led CSOs (CPs or allies). Reach values means that the total reach of CSOs, youth or any other unit of measurement during the reporting period is counted/reported on. ​ Links with MFA SCS 8: - **SCS082 # of youth led CSOs using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth.** The baseline value is zero even though the collaborating partners were implementing activities around SRHR; these were not from an intersectional perspective. The capacity of collaborating partners will be built through the different planned capacity strengthening trainings in conducting intersectional SRHR. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Only count CSO Allies: - that, based on the interaction/collaboration/ideas of the CSO CPs, are adopting intersectional SRHR in their work and - that have an SRHR advocacy strategy including intersectionality. ​ Reporting annually, on reach values, of not youth or women led CSO allies. ​ Links with MFA SCS 8: - **SCS083 # of CSOs (not youth led or women led) using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth** The programme baseline value is zero because the concept of intersectionality in SRHR had not yet spread to other CSOs other than the consortium partners and collaborating partners. ​ The target for 2022 is still zero because a lot of effort is geared towards building the capacity of collaborating partners to understand the programme to be able to reach out to other CSOs (allies) with the same concept in 2023. Hence we expect CSO allies to adopt intersectionality in 2023. TBD in 2023. The target for 2022 is still zero because a lot of effort is geared towards building the capacity of collaborating partners to understand the programme to be able to reach out to other CSOs (allies) with the same concept in 2023. Hence we expect CSO allies to adopt intersectionality in 2023. Count all the CSO, both Make Way Collaborating partners and Allies that have an advocacy agenda. This means concrete: - activities planned - budgeted - linked to a timeframe A CSO (collaborating partner or ally) will be counted if they have at least 2 activities planned for and/or implemented targeting SRHR of minoritised youth. ​ Reporting annually, on reach values, of **not youth or women led** CSOs (CPs or allies). Reach values means that the total reach of CSOs, youth or any other unit of measurement during the reporting period is counted/reported on. ​ Links with MFA SCS 8: - **SCS083 # of CSOs (not youth led or women led) using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth.** The baseline value is zero even though the collaborating partners were implementing activities around SRHR; these were not from an intersectional perspective. The capacity of collaborating partners will be built through the different planned capacity strengthening trainings in conducting intersectional SRHR. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. ​ to be completed! (example below) Count the collaborating partner only if: - they have implemented at least 75% of the activities as planned. ​ Reporting annually, on reach values, of youth-led CPs. ​ Links with MFA SCS 8: - **SCS082 # of youth led CSOs using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth** In 2021, collaborating partners assessed their capacity and knowledge to self organise and help scale up intersectionality advocacy approaches for SRHR. They developed action plans based on these assessments to guide the integration process. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. to be completed! (example below) Count the collaborating partner only if: - they have implemented at least 75% of the activities as planned. ​ Reporting annually, on reach values, of **non-youth-or-women led** CPs. ​ Links with MFA SCS 8: - **SCS083 # of CSOs (not youth led or women led) using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth** In 2021, collaborating partners assessed their capacity and knowledge to self organise and help scale up intersectionality advocacy approaches for SRHR. They developed action plans based on these assessments to guide the integration process. ​ Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Joint: More than one organisation. Representing at least 2 constituencies. Implemented: Activities conducted based on plans. ​ Suggestion for formula: Only count activities that: - Are conducted based on advocacy plans. - Include more than one organisation. (joint) - Representing at least 2 constituencies. ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links with MFA SCS 4: **SCS041 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency** In 2021, consortium partners identified CSOs as collaborating partners. These collaborating partners needed to understand the concept of intersectionality in SRHR before implementing any activities. The different trainings are scheduled for 2022. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. Joint: More than one organisation. Representing at least 2 constituencies. Implemented: Activities conducted based on plans. ​ Suggestion for formula: Only count activities that: - Are conducted based on advocacy plans. - Include more than one organisation. (joint) - Representing at least 2 constituencies. ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links with MFA SCS 4: **SCS042 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency at sub-national level** In 2021, consortium partners identified CSOs as collaborating partners. These collaborating partners needed to understand the concept of intersectionality in SRHR before implementing any activities. The different trainings are scheduled for 2022. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. Engagements: These may include dialogues, meetings, talkshows where the two parties discuss SRHR of minoritised youth. Duty bearers: Persons responsible for fulfilling SRHR e.g CAO, DHO, DHE, MPs, LC, Ministries, etc CSO: Early adopter, Make Way CSO ally or consortium partner ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links with MFA SCS 3: **SCS031 - # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level** For MFA we measure 3 times, unique values: target for the full programme; actual at MTR and actual at End of Programme. ​ Since the programme was in its inception phase in 2021, there were no CSO engagements with duty bearers on the realisation of SRHR for minoritised youth. The CSO engagements with duty bearers in 2021 were to introduce the programme and its objectives. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. Engagements: These may include dialogues, meetings, talkshows where the two parties discuss SRHR of minoritised youth. Duty bearers: Persons responsible for fulfilling SRHR e.g CAO, DHO, DHE, MPs, LC, Ministries, etc CSO: Early adopter, Make Way CSO ally or consortium partner ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links with MFA SCS 3: **SCS032 - # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at sub-national level** For MFA we measure 3 times, unique values: target for the full programme; actual at MTR and actual at End of Programme. ​ Since the programme was in its inception phase in 2021, there were no CSO engagements with duty bearers on the realisation of SRHR for minoritised youth. The CSO engagements with duty bearers in 2021 were to introduce the programme and its objectives. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. This indicator tracks the number of minoritised youth i.e youth with disabilities, sex workers, girls, LGBTQI+, etc. who participate in at least one engagement/meeting/workshop that involves making decisions on SRHR at any level; regional, national. If all the categories of minoritised youth participate in at least 2 decision making processes in a given year, then we would have achieved a degree of inclusion in youth participating in SRHR decision making processes. ​ Reporting is annually, on reach values (i.e. the number that is counted in year one, can also be included in the actual for the second year). ​ Links with SRHR indicator A: SRH002f - # of youth (female) who participate in policy and decision-making bodies who perceive their participation as meaningful The CCG is conducting a baseline study to establish the current number of minoritised youth participating in decision making processes on their SRHR, at all levels i.e national and district. Since the baseline value will be established in 2022, this data will guide in setting the target for 2023. Since the baseline value will be established in 2022, this data will guide in setting the target for 2023. This indicator tracks the number of minoritised youth i.e youth with disabilities, sex workers, girls, LGBTQI+, etc. who participate in at least one engagement/meeting/workshop that involves making decisions on SRHR at any level; regional, national. If all the categories of minoritised youth participate in at least 2 decision making processes in a given year, then we would have achieved a degree of inclusion in youth participating in SRHR decision making processes. ​ Reporting is annually, on reach values (i.e. the number that is counted in year one, can also be included in the actual for the second year). ​ Links with SRHR indicator A: SRH002m - # of youth (male) who participate in policy and decision-making bodies who perceive their participation as meaningful The CCG is conducting a baseline study to establish the current number of minoritised youth participating in decision making processes on their SRHR, at all levels i.e national and district. Since the baseline value will be established in 2022, this data will guide in setting the target for 2023. Since the baseline value will be established in 2022, this data will guide in setting the target for 2023. This indicator tracks the number of minoritised youth i.e youth with disabilities, sex workers, girls, LGBTQI+, etc. who participate in at least one engagement/meeting/workshop that involves making decisions on SRHR at any level; regional, national. If all the categories of minoritised youth participate in at least 2 decision making processes in a given year, then we would have achieved a degree of inclusion in youth participating in SRHR decision making processes. ​ Reporting is annually, on reach values (i.e. the number that is counted in year one, can also be included in the actual for the second year). ​ Links with SRHR indicator A: SRH002x - # of youth (other) who participate in policy and decision-making bodies who perceive their participation as meaningful The CCG is conducting a baseline study to establish the current number of minoritised youth participating in decision making processes on their SRHR, at all levels i.e national and district. Since the baseline value will be established in 2022, this data will guide in setting the target for 2023. Since the baseline value will be established in 2022, this data will guide in setting the target for 2023. This indicator tracks the number of minoritised youth i.e youth with disabilities, sex workers, girls, LGBTQI+, etc. who participate in at least one engagement/meeting/workshop that involves making decisions on SRHR at any level; regional, national. If all the categories of minoritised youth participate in at least 2 decision making processes in a given year, then we would have achieved a degree of inclusion in youth participating in SRHR decision making processes. ​ Reporting is annually, on reach values (i.e. the number that is counted in year one, can also be included in the actual for the second year). ​ Links with SRHR indicator A: SRH002 - # of youth (gender not-specified) who participate in policy and decision-making bodies who perceive their participation as meaningful The CCG is conducting a baseline study to establish the current number of minoritised youth participating in decision making processes on their SRHR, at all levels i.e national and district. Since the baseline value will be established in 2022, this data will guide in setting the target for 2023. Since the baseline value will be established in 2022, this data will guide in setting the target for 2023. NL-KVK-41201644-10316 Wemos Foundation Make Way Regional Global Context - Wemos Make Way - embracing intersectionality for health equity & justice. The Make Way programme (2021-2025) aims to ensure youth in all their diversity can fully realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). We promote an intersectional approach to addressing SRHR issues. This means making overlapping vulnerabilities visible to understand their effects on people’s SRHR. We develop innovative tools and build capacities of other civil society organisations to advocate the needed policy and societal changes. Our partnership consists of Akina Mama wa Afrika, The Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians, Kenya, Forum for African Women Educationalists, Liliane Foundation, VSO Netherlands, and Wemos, and we work in partnership with the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. We implement Make Way in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, the Eastern and Southern African region and at the global level. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Akvo Foundation Wemos Renée Bouhuijs PMEL Coordinator renee.bouhuijs@wemos.nl Ellermanstraat 15-O, 1114 AK Amsterdam-Duivendrecht, The Netherlands 52.3675734 4.9041389 500632.00 818830.00 746718.00 815178.00 553219.00 3565558.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Regional-Global, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 517134.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Regional-Global context in 2021 705967.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Regional-Global context in 2022 874073.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Regional-Global context in 2023 825204.00 Actual expenses of Wemos in Regional-Global context in 2024 Report on the number of CSOs that have integrated an intersectional lens in their evidence building. We count every time that the SRHR toolkit is used in research, development of communication products, selection of consultants, etc. CSOs are Make Way consortium partners and Make Way collaborating partners. ​ Reporting annually, on reach values. ​ Links with: MFA SCS083 - # of CSOs (not youth led or women led) using a Gender and Social Inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth. At the beginning of the Make Way programme, none of the consortium partners had integrated intersectionality in the way they are doing their research and evidence building. ​ 16-12-2022: Status update 2021: Wemos and NUDOR carried out a case study entitled 'The role of global health initiatives in health systems strengthening in Rwanda'. In this study's research framework, an intersectional perspective was incorporated. This intersectional perspective was based on one of the first tools in the Make Way Intersectional Toolkit: the Intersectionality Based Policy Analysis. We would like to see one consortium partner and at least one collaborating partner to have examples of having integrated an intersectional lens into their evidence building, e.g., having an intersectional research framework, using intersectional data, using intersectional questionnaires, being more inclusive in their research process. 24-04-2023: Wemos used the IBPA to analyse the GFF Alignment Working Group framework and provided feedback to the Group based on this analysis. (Wemos value increased from 1 in 2021 to 2 for 2022) For 2023, as context we will target 2 new organisations that will integrate an intersectional lens in their evidence building. In 2022, we had targeted 7 organisations to do so. We would like to see the organisations to show examples of having integrated an intersectional lens into their evidence building, e.g., having an intersectional research framework, using intersectional data, using intersectional questionnaires, being more inclusive in their research process. Wemos will report on the actual of 2023 towards the target value of 4. In the actual it will be specified which organisations this will include. 29-04-2024: All Make Way consortium partners continued using an intersectional lens/tools in their evidence building for (joint) lobby and advocacy activities in 2023; Furthermore, two technical partners from Wemos used intersectional tools to develop evidence supporting Make Way country teams in their lobbying and advocacy efforts. This indicator necessitates a considerable amount of time due to the need for training in intersectionality within evidence building. Therefore, we are adhering to the same trajectory as in previous years, using the results we successfully achieved in prior years as a reference point to establish our targets for the current year. 30-04-2025: Wemos and Technical partners in Ethiopia and Rwanda are included in the actual value. All Make Way consortium partners continued using an intersectional lens/tools in their evidence building for (joint) lobby and advocacy activities in 2024. Some examples of using intersectional lens/tools are: * Used the Intersectionality based policy analysis (IBPA) tool when developing the research framework and interview guides for a qualitative case study about the impact of IMF conditionalities in Zambia's healthcare. * Used the IBPA tool when developing feedback for the World Bank Group Gender Strategy, the Gender Toolkit, and providing feedback on an inception report of GFF mid term evaluation. * Used Meaningful Youth engagement tool to deliver a training for the CCG Zambia and other partners * Used the intersectional See Judge Act (ISJA) tool in collaboration with our collaborating partner in Kenya to campaign against violence against women and girls at regional and global level. * AmwA, VSO, LF wrote a Make Way statement for the CSW focusing on intersectionality, SRHR and the empowerment of gender diverse people and women; LF provided suggestions for the zero draft of the EU position paper, focusing on SRHR, intersectionality and disability; In addition, our technical partners in Rwanda and Ethiopia used intersectional lens to develop evidence supporting in-country lobbying and advocacy efforts. Partner in Rwanda had conducted an assessment on the Enablers and Barriers to Inclusive and Intersectional SRHR Services for Adolescents: A Multi-dimensional Analysis of Health System Infrastructure, Policy, and Healthcare Provider Capacity in Rwanda Partner in Ethiopia used Make Way checklist for budget analysis in advocacy, to conduct a structured and systematic evaluation assessing the alignment of budget allocations and expenditures with the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of marginalized communities, emphasizing gender considerations in Ethi ... Make Way consortium partners will continue using an intersectional lens/tool in their evidence building for (joint) lobby and advocacy activities. Count the number of action plans set by CSOs on how to include intersectionality in their internal strategies/processes. CSOs are Make Way consortium partners and Make Way collaborating partners. We are counting action plans, not completed activities. Reporting annually, on unique values. ​ Links with: MFA SRH023: # of CSOs (not youth or women led) with increased L&A capacities Organisational and L&A capacity assessments. At the beginning of the Make Way programme, none of the consortium partners had intersectional internal strategies and processes. ​ 16-12-2022: Status update 2021: Wemos did a review of their policies/ procedures/ guidelines, to address issues related to inclusion and diversity and safeguards against unwanted behaviour in the workplace, including exploitation, discrimination, and harassment. Τhey had further internal discussions on, amongst other topics, diversity and decolonisation of aid, and possible implications for Wemos’ policies, training, and organisational set-up. Wemos contracted a consultant/facilitator to assess Wemos’ role as a northern CSO, after having discussions with stakeholders from the South that Wemos has collaborated with (the assessment itself took place in 2022). We would like to see one consortium partner and at least one collaborating partner to have some kind of actions in place to include intersectionality in internal strategies and policies, e.g., an inclusive gender strategy, recruitment policy, decision-making process etc. 28-04-2023: Wemos had a discussion with one of the CPs to brainstorm about how to support each other. The CP decided to incorporate intersectionality into their new upcoming strategy and their communication approach, and asked for our support (this will be implemented in 2023). The added '1' value under Wemos represents the CP's action plan. Moreover, Wemos followed up on its action plans (reported on in 2021) this year by refining its human resource practices to promote inclusion and equity, leading to greater diversity among Wemos employees. For 2023, we will target 2 new organisations to develop action plans. The full target value is reported by Wemos, but naturally other consortium partners, and collaborating partners, will be contributing to this result. The whole story behind this contribution will be explained comprehensively in our narrative reporting and in the descriptive information that will be added to the actual results. 29-04-2024: Wemos' technical partner in Rwanda has planned to conduct a study on Assessing the Enablers and Barriers to Inclusive and Intersectional SRHR Services for Adolescents. This will be implemented in 2024. Moreover, all 6 consortium partners continued the implementation of their action plans for more intersectional internal strategies and processes. (previously reported on in 2021) This particular indicator typically requires some time to achieve, as it pertains to the adoption of strategies and processes, and often involves an iterative process. The current indicator value has been set at a level that the consortium is highly confident in attaining 30-04-2025: Wemos' technical partner in Rwanda had conducted an assessment on the Enablers and Barriers to Inclusive and Intersectional SRHR Services for Adolescents: A Multi-dimensional Analysis of Health System Infrastructure, Policy, and Healthcare Provider Capacity in Rwanda (report in SharePoint). This assessment was done with an objective to determine the barriers and enablers to inclusive and intersectional SRHR services for adolescents and recommend appropriate actions to stakeholders. (actual for this was reported in 2023) All consortium partners continued the implementation of their action plans for more intersectional internal strategies and processes (previously reported on in 2021). All consortium partners will continue the implementation of their action plans for more intersectional internal strategies and processes (previously reported on in 2021). Activities for mutual learnings and capacity building on use of intersectional tools are planned for 2025. As we are approaching the end of the programme, we no longer expect CSOs to make changes to their internal strategies Report the number of joint advocacy activities at regional and global level that are more inclusive of CSOs, youth and minoritised groups. ​ With 'CSOs' we mean: Make Way consortium partners (RGT), Make Way collaborating partners (RGT) and CSO allies Joint activities: This does not necessarily mean all partners at all times. We count joint activities regardless of whether we provided support or not. With 'more inclusive' we mean: representing youth and minoritised persons, including from the country level when relevant, that actively participate in the planning and/or implementation of an advocacy activity. ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to MFA SCS4: MFA SCS041 - # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency Before Make Way programme, the consortium partners and collaborating partners had not engaged in joint advocacy activities. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 17-01-2024: In 2023: - Wemos and AMwA organised and co-sponsored a session at the Civil Society Policy Forum, ahead of the World Bank/IMF Spiring Meetings 2023 (title of the session: Making a Real Difference? Lessons from the Financing of Health and Education for the World Bank Groups Evolution Roadmap) - Wemos supported the RGCG YP to submit a proposal to the PMNCH Youth and Adolescent Forum, which will take place in October. Proposal co-sponsored by one of our collaborating partner. -RGCG small grants are going to be used to facilitate the participation of youth panel members (including RGCG YP) at the Women Deliver. | 21-04-2023: RGCG, initiative led by Wemos, provided input into the response of the Dutch Global Health Alliance on the Dutch Global Health Strategy. By more inclusive joint advocacy activities we mean activities where youth and minoritised persons, including from the country level when relevant, actively participate in the planning and/or implementation of an advocacy activity. Such activities can be participation in regional/global decision making bodies and/or advocacy spaces, participation in conferences/webinars, campaigning etc. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme) Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: • Youth representatives from Make Way countries were supported to attend the CSW68; RGCG held preparatory calls and daily check-ins for session selection, attendance, statement preparation, networking, and mentoring for the CSW68. They moderated in-person sessions, and delivered a statement in sign language during the official youth dialogue of the CSW68. • A Uganda Youth Panel member has been participating in the consultation sessions for the African Regional Forum on the SDGs and were supported to attend. • RGCG youth panelist participate in the UN Civil Society Conference. A number of Make Way youth panelists and members of youth-led collaborating parnter from Kenya participated in our 1-day pre-conference Make Way workshop. RGCG youth panelist co-facilitated. • We also supported RGCG youth panelists to participate at the Reproductive Health Network Kenya scientific conference in Mombasa. • Webinar on Summit and Pact for Future: An interactive webinar on the Summit and Pact for the Future, for Make Way RGCG members and allies, was hosted by AMwA • Afrika Dag 2024: Sessions on tax justice and decolonizing LGBTQ+ work for CSOs/allies • The RGCG also issued a small grant to collaborating partner in Ethiopia to engage in Global Campaign for Education-related advocacy activities. With 'Successful' we mean: cases of advocacy where we saw changes in agenda-setting, strategy content, and meaningful civil society contributions With 'Harmonised' we mean: having global policies agree with each other and not create silos/fragmentation With 'Aligned' we mean: aligning with national policies in terms of funding and priorities With Global Health Initiatives (GHIs), we mean: Global Fund, Gavi and the GFF ​ The indicator is counted when the change has to do with either policy priorities, with funding, or with both. This indicator is counted if at least one actor changes. ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS3: SCS031 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level Analysis of international agreements, policies and laws included in context analysis. There are existing policies on the harmonisation and alignment of global health initiatives, i.e., the WHO's Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All (GAP). The GFF's 2021-2025 Global Strategy also focuses on partner alignment behind country priorities and has established an Alignment Working Group which will pilot an alignment programme in ten countries. The ACT-A initiative is another example of global health initiatives coming together. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 17-01-2024: In 2023: - Wemos has been having regular communication with the WHO GAP Secretariat in the last two years. The WHO GAP Secretariat is now often reaching out to Wemos for support for better civil society engagement and for disseminating their reports and research findings. The WHO GAP Secretariat has set as a goal to strengthen engagement with civil society, as per the GAP Progress Report 2023. | 17-01-2024: In 2022: - After suggestions from the civil society constituency (also expressed by Wemos), the Alignment Working Group of the GFF invited a civil society representative to join the group (which had been operating for almost its first year without civil society participation). Myria joined the AWG, as part of her work as a GFF civil society representative tot he Investors Group. - During the meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) in December, delegates from Kenya, Ethiopia and Uganda made statements in line with messages from the G2H2 report on funding for pandemic preparedness prevention and response - In January, Wemos sent a letter to the GFATM regarding private sector engagement in healthcare, which we also discussed with the Global Fund Advocates Network meetings. This letter likely contributed to the Global Fund Advocates Network developing a brief in response to GFATM publications about private sector engagement - The GFF Investor's Group co-chair from a GFF country (this time Ethiopia's MoH Dr Tadesse) attended for the first time the meetings of the Trust Fund Committee on June 21st, 2022. Wemos has been advocating for this continuously since 2018. Cumulative target for the full programme is 5. We want to see proof that global health initiatives indeed operationalise and implement their global commitments at country-level. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme) 30-04-2025: Progress update: Wemos continued enagaging meaningfully representing the civil society and giving their input in GFF investers group, GFF Alignment Working Group It includes all advocacy activities, either they are successful or not Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 4: - SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency, at (inter)national level Analysis of international agreements, policies and laws included in context analysis. There are existing policies on the harmonisation and alignment of global health initiatives, i.e., the WHO's Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All (GAP). The GFF's 2021-2025 Global Strategy also focuses on partner alignment behind country priorities and has established an Alignment Working Group which will pilot an alignment programme in ten countries. Th ACT-A initiative is another example of global health initiatives coming together. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 17-01-2024: In 2023: - Wemos was invited and participated as a panellist at a global-level webinar on alignment of development partners, organised by the GFF Alignment Community of Practice, on 11/01. - Wemos participate in two events organised by the WHO GAP Secretariat, during the consultations ahead of the UN High-Level Meetings that will take place in September. The events (9-10/5) were an opportunity to engage with the WHO about civil society engagement in alignment development cooperation for health. - As part of the G2H2 policy debates ahead of the WHA2023, Wemos organised a panel discussion on the topic of alignment of global health initiatives, which took place on 15/05. In the panel, we had representatives from the WHO GAP Secretariat, the GFF Alignment Working Group, the Future of Global Health Initiatives, and the consultant that did the 3G study for Wemos. - During the WHA 2023, Wemos is co-organising a civil society event with Save the Children titled "Health Financing: leaving no one behind". During this event, we raised our position about alignment and coordination, with examples from our studies. - Wemos, Cordaid and N'weti completed a comparative study on the alignment of the 3Gs (GFF, Global Fund, Gavi) in Rwanda, the DRC and Mozambique, and published a policy brief. | 17-01-2024: In 2022: -Wemos has been raising the topic of civil society engagement in the Alignment Working Group, during the Investors Group meetings and the discussions with civil society. We also provided this as a feedback to the framework of the Alignment Working Group - Wemos has been raising the issue of alignment during the GFF's Investors Group meetings, and in bilateral exchanges with members of the Investors Group - Wemos has been maintaining an active relationship with the WHO GAP Secretariat, exchanging about development on alignment of global health strategies - Wemos co-published a paper on funding for pandemic preparedness, prevention and response with the G2H ... Cumulative target for the full programme is 10.Example of activities towards this change include: - Evidence building: analysing how global health initiatives work together at country level. - Use the evidence in relevant global fora, e.g., the WHO GAP Secretariat, the Global Fund, the GFF Investors Group - Use the evidence for national level advocacy, together with our country partners - Monitor the work of the GFF's Alignments Working Group - Ensure civil society engagement at the GFF Alignment Working Group work and the WHO GAP Secretariat. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: In 2023 Q3/Q4: * - Wemos jointly with other CSOs organised a webinar to launch the report on the alignment of the 3Gs in Rwanda, DRC and Mozambique. * The civil society representative to the GFF Investors Group (Wemos) attended the GFF Investors Group meetings; And raised points on alignment and coordination of global health initiatives, meaningful engagement of civil society and youth in global health governance, the risks of private sector engagement in health care, SRHR and gender equality. In 2024: * Followed the developments around the Lusaka Agenda and monitor changes in actors' strategies and policies which are in accordance to the Lusaka Agenda commitments * Organised activities around gaining Dutch political commitments of the Lusaka Agenda (Future of Global Health Initiative) * Wemos also provided feedback on the mid-term evaluation inception report. We suggested using the outcomes of the GFF Alignment Framework implementation, assessing the opportunities of financial alignment and DRM, alignment with the HRH operational plan, and ensure civil society engagement, We also suggested sources of evidence that can inform the evaluation, e.g., the WHO Health Financing Progress Matrix in Ethiopia. This indicator is counted if at least one actor changes Successful: cases of advocacy where we saw changes in agenda-setting, strategy content, and meaningful civil society contributions Development partners: the Dutch MFA, and other development partners that will be specified along the way Public first approach to health financing: Countries increase and utilise first their domestic public resources for health, before resorting to private sector engagement Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 3: - SCS031 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level Analysis of international agreements, policies and laws included in context analysis. A key global policy relevant to this indicator is the World Bank's ‘From Billions to Trillions’ agenda and the Cascade/ Maximising Finance for Development (MFD) approach. Since the early 2000s, the use of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) for healthcare provision and financing has increased worldwide. In its MFD strategy, the World Bank proposes a ‘private-first approach’, giving a central role to private finance and PPPs. Despite this growing interest, PPPs are a controversial instrument of healthcare provision and financing. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 17-01-2024: In 2023: - Wemos has contributed to the discourse on public finance in the final report from WHO council on the Economics of Health for All. Several of the recommendations in the report align with the advocacy messages that Wemos, along with other civil society organizations, have been championing for years. For example, the report mentions the necessity to regulate and govern private healthcare actors to ensure they cause no barriers to access or affordability of health services. It also suggests measures like debt suspension and wealth taxes to promote global financial justice and generate fiscal space for public healthcare. Such measures were especially highlighted in our latest “Statement on Universal Health Coverage” and “Statement on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response”, disseminated and pitched during the UN Multistakeholder Hearings on 8-9 May 2023. Additionally, the report calls for rethinking the governance around pharmaceutical innovation, proposing measures like the IP waiver and conditionalities attached to publicly funded research. In this regard, Wemos have been calling for overcoming IP barriers, attaching conditions to public funding of research and development, and transparency of the market, ultimately aiming to improve global access to pharmaceutical products – see our position paper on regional production and our call for a meaningful Pandemic Accord. | 17-01-2024: In 2022: - Discursive change: during the Civil Society Policy Forum 2022 Spring Meetings in April, Wemos organised a session on health, privatisation and the role of the IFC. During the session, our report on IFC investments in the health sector was launched. Three officers from the IFC (Aliza Marcus, Charles Dalton and Christopher McCahan) and one from the WB (Andreas Seiter) were present in the session. During the session, Andreas Seiter and Charles Dalton both affirmed the primary role of public financing and the government role to provide UHC. - In Apr ... Cumulative target for the programme is 4. We want to see regional and global duty bearers support a public-first approach to health financing that addresses the sexual and reproductive health needs of everyone, starting from those left behind. We want to see the global health community supporting national governments' efforts to increase domestic resources for health. We need more effective and sustainable means to expand fiscal space, including meeting ODA commitments, tackling tax avoidance and evasion, and an immediate cancellation of debt payments, linked to a more comprehensive approach to debt crisis resolution. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: The final Scorecard document from World Bank reflected recommendations put forward in the policy brief. Most notably, the document acknowledges the importance of financial protection as a core dimension of Universal Health Coverage. While it does not include a measurable sub-indicator on catastrophic health expenditures, the methodology states that financial protection should be reflected “as much as possible” in results-focused narratives and other documentation of impact. The policy brief was developed by Wemos together with other members of the Consortium on the Commercialisation of Healthcare. Includes all advocacy activities, either they are successful or not ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 4: - SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency Analysis of international agreements, policies and laws included in context analysis. A key global policy relevant to this indicator is the World Bank's ‘From Billions to Trillions’ agenda and the Cascade/ Maximising Finance for Development (MFD) approach. Since the early 2000s, the use of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) for healthcare provision and financing has increased worldwide. In its MFD strategy, the World Bank proposes a ‘private-first approach’, giving a central role to private finance and PPPs. Despite this growing interest, PPPs are a controversial instrument of healthcare provision and financing. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 17-01-2024: In 2023: - On 17/03 Luc Laviolette, the head of the GFF Secretariat visited the Netherlands, with Bruno Rivalan from the Secretariat. Wemos had an online meeting where we also discussed the AMEF study and the relationship of the GFF with the IFC. - Preliminary results of the AMEF study were presented to the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) staff in October 2022, in their DC offices, by Wemos' and AMwA's staff. The final report was shared after the publication in January 2023. IEG staff acknowledged receipt of the documents and responded that they will consider the results in the report for their upcoming evaluation. Virtual acquaintance (via email) took place in March 2023. Specific details about the evaluation will be discussed in June 2023 (as per program of the IEG). Communication with the IEG continued over the coures of Q2 2023. - Wemos coorganized and participated in a panel on Healthcare financialziation and the role of the IFC, during the G2H2 policy debates in May 2023, ahead of the World Health Assembly (Banking on health: The surging pandemic of health financialization) - Wemos participated in the Tuesday group meetings, and in a meeting with Dutch representative in international financing institutions. | 21-04-2023: 2022 progress update: - Wemos presented the findings at the Tuesday Group meeting, just ahead of the Annual meetings. The Tuesday group is a group of CSOs/advocates that regularly meets with the MoFA for advocacy purposes towards the Bretton Woods institutions (World Bank Group and IMF). - Additionally, in partnership with Oxfam, Wemos and AMwA met with World Bank and IMF officials to share findings from the AMEF study, the need for public financing for health, the role of the private sector in health financing and accountable mechanisms to ensure people are valued over profit in the varied financing mechanisms. (joint activity, counted under Wemos) - Wemos and AMwA shared findings with the IDA Private Sector Window staff ... Cumulative target for the programme is 7.Example of activities towards this change include: - Evidence building: develop cases of how a private-first approach influences health systems - Use the evidence for advocacy towards global actors, i.e., the World Bank, the GFF, the Global Fund - Use the evidence in advocacy in global fora, i.e., the IMF/World Bank Annual and Spring Meetings and the GFF Investors Group. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: 2023 Q3/Q4: *Participated actively in ongoing (monthly or bi-monthly) calls/collaborations of relevant North-South CSO networks and help 'joining of forces' (through merging or otherwise). E.g. Consortium against commercialisation in healthcare,Financing for Development (FfD) ,Global Public Investment Network (GPIN) Health working group 2024: *Provided relevant input to the mid-term evaluation report's review process to ensure the inclusion of assessment of blended finance questions *Provided input to the work of the GFF's technical advisory group on private sector engagement in the health sector in consultation with RGCG and in relation to intersectionality *Advocacy activities around the development/capital investment in the health sector *Meetings with the WHO Health Financing and Economics staff *Advocacy activities towards the World Bank Group (WBG) adopting stricter selection criteria's for private capital investment in the health sector: In 2024, the World Bank developed its new Scorecard to measure and monitor the impact of the projects and programmes it supports. Wemos participated in the public consultation on the new World Bank Scorecard; Follow up on IDA20 MTR and watch run-up to IDA21 replenishment; Participated in the Tuesday group and raise awareness with Dutch representatives at the WBG about investments in private healthcare. This indicator is counted if at least one actor changes. Successful: cases of advocacy where we saw changes in agenda-setting, strategy content, and meaningful civil society contributions. ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 3: - SCS031 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level Analysis of international agreements, policies and laws included in context analysis. Global health initiatives (Global Fund, Gavi, GFF), actors like the World Bank and IMF, and bi-lateral donors influence through their agenda-setting, funding decisions and implementation of programmes. They influence the availability, the allocation and the utilization of a country's health resources (quality and quantity of funds). Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 17-01-2024: No updates. Cumulative target for the full programme is 5. The change we want to see is that global actors like Global Fund, Gavi, GFF, World Bank and IMF are including civil society in their decision-making and policy-making with regards to development financing, and that they are transparent in their processes. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: In 2023, Wemos joined a taskforce to develop feedback to the final version of the WBG Gender Strategy. We submitted out joint feedback and also participated online consultation with the Bank Gender Team. Wemos points were on GBV, intersectionality, and SRHR. Our points were included in the consultation summary that the Bank published. In 2024, During the last rounds of negotiation towards the final Pact (Pact for the Future), Wemos delivered critical input through the Health ImPACT Coalition on the need to strengthen public health systems among others. The Health Impact Coalition was granted speaking time during the Summit of the Future at the UN. Includes all advocacy activities, either they are successful or not ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 4: - SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency Analysis of international agreements, policies and laws included in context analysis. Global health initiatives (Global Fund, Gavi, GFF), actors like the World Bank and IMF, and bi-lateral donors influence through their agenda-setting, funding decisions and implementation of programmes. They influence the availability, the allocation and the utilization of a country's health resources (quality and quantity of funds). Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 17-01-2024: In 2023, - Wemos participated in the #endausterity coalition in-person meeting in Brussels, on 15/06 - Wemos joins the calls of the IMF Gender Strategy group, which is now broader and combines both IMF and World Bank. It is called now the IFI Gender strategy group. Myria established contact with Oxfam to try to include intersectionality in the upcoming World Bank gender strategy. More to come later in the year. | 21-04-2023: 2022 progress update: As part of the EndAusterity Festival, and as co-publishing organisation, we published a news article on Wemos' website (30 Sep. 2022) and did some social media messaging around it. Wemos provided additional paragraphs, text edits and references related to health financing and health system impacts to the latest EndAusterity report by Isabel Ortiz and Matthew Cummins, and did some factual checking. Wemos has been asked and confirmed to co-publish the report. Cumulative target for the full programme is 8.Examples of activities towards this change include: - Evidence building on development financing approaches - Use of the evidence in global advocacy spaces, such as the IMF/World Bank Annual and Spring Meetings, the GFF's Investors Group, The Global Fund Board, the ACT-A, bi-lateral donors such as the Netherlands. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: 2023: *In Q3/Q4, Wemos also joined a taskforce, contributed to the feedback to the final version of the WBG Gender Strategy *During the Civil Society Policy Forum (CSPF), AMwA and Wemos participated in several events organized and promoted by the endausterity coalition and affiliated partners 2024: *Organised lobby and advocacy for the importance of feminist and rights based approaches, integration of SRHR and gender inclusive language, inclusive health systems and financial guidance of Wemos to be integrated into the Pact of the Future at the Summit in 2024. AMwA jointly organised consulations, pre-conference activtiies and co-convened events during the summit of the Future. *Analysed of the final version(s) of the draft Pact for the Future through a health systems and financial justice lens, with special focus on SRHR, and delivered critical input through Health ImPACT Coalition *Used or developed communication materials that clarify why international cooperation in tax and debt matters and reforms in the international financial architecture is absolutely necessary to expand fiscal space for health: e.g. Zambia study- impact of the IMF programme in Zambia (article); Wemos and Tax Justice Netherlands wrote an OpEd (Opiniestuk); organized a session on tax justice for universal healthcare during the Afrikadag; *In view of the upcoming 4th International Financing for Development Conference (FfD4), we provided inputs to the FfD4 Elements paper, through the Civil Society FfD workstreams on domestic resource mobilization/tax, Private Finance, and International Development Cooperation *And we addressed relevant Dutch government staff, through an email letter and social media messages, in the joint advocacy action led by Tax Justice Europe towards EU member states to call for a ‘yes’ vote on the adoption of the UN Tax Convention-TOR in UNGA Com2. This indicator is counted if at least one actor changes Successful: cases of advocacy where we saw changes in agenda-setting, strategy content, and meaningful civil society contributions With 'global actors' we mean: Those involved in the ACT-A (Access to Covid-19 Tools Accelerator (a global collaboration to accelerate development, production, and equitable access to Covid-19 tests, treatments, and vaccines)) ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 3: - SCS031 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level Analysis of ACT-A included in context analysis. This is a policy adopted by BMFG, CEPI, FIND, Gavi, The Global Fund, Unitaid, Wellcome, WHO, World Bank. The ACT-Accelerator is organized into four pillars of work: diagnostics, treatment, vaccines (COVAX) and health system strengthening (the health systems connector-HSC). The ACT-A Health Systems Connector contributes to maintenance and building back of essential services, and it is relevant to maintaining SRH services. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 17-01-2024: In 2022: The health systems and response connector pillar (HSRC) to which Wemos is a civil society representative, has set up two work streams; one on Health Workforce and one on Health Systems and Response Financing. Wemos is nominated to be a representative in those task teams. ACT-A will not be continued after 2022, but in 2023 we focus our advocacy on the WHO instrument on Pandemic Preparedness and Response The full target value is reported by Wemos, but naturally other consortium partners, and collaborating partners, will be contributing to this result. The whole story behind this contribution will be explained comprehensively in our narrative reporting and in the descriptive information that will be added to the actual results. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: Together with the Geneva Global Health Hub (G2H2) INB working group, Wemos submitted a statement on fair financing in the pandemic accord to the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body(INB). Wemos participated in INB11 as G2H2 representative to talk to delegates about the financing paragraphs, in the lead up to INB12. G2H2 statement was on agenda for INB12. Wemos aligned with the G2H2 working group on the pandemic agreement, on a statement made in the second week of INB12 (in 2024). It includes all advocacy activities, either they are successful or not. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 4: - SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency Analysis of ACT-A included in context analysis. This is a policy adopted by BMFG, CEPI, FIND, Gavi, The Global Fund, Unitaid, Wellcome, WHO, World Bank. The ACT-Accelerator is organized into four pillars of work: diagnostics, treatment, vaccines (COVAX) and health system strengthening (the health systems connector-HSC). The ACT-A Health Systems Connector contributes to maintenance and building back of essential services, and it is relevant to maintaining SRH services. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. ​ For 2022, we expect to reach a value of 2, for that year focused on ACT-A. Some of the activities towards this change: - participation in the ACT-A HSC civil society constituency - pushing for inclusion of equity, HRH, HSS and LGBTQI+ rights 17-01-2024: In 2023: - Wemos did an actor mapping of MoH and MoFA staff who are involved in the WHO processes around PPPR. Wemos Wemos exchanges with the Dutch representatives, via calls and emails, mostly Mark van Passel and Maurice Galla. They invited Wemos to the MoH for a meeting, with the DGHA and others. The meeting was about the Pandemic Accord. In February we met with Astrid Dunselman, MoFa representative in Geneva. - Wemos initiated another meeting, which took place on May 17, where we received an update and provided inputs on A2M, F4PPPR and Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR). - Wemos wrote and disseminated an assessment of the zero draft (including financing) amongst relevant policy makers, since there was not a public hearing with the Dutch government. - Wemos (also on behalf of AMwA) delivered a statement on financing for PPPR during the public hearings on 9/5 in New York. - Wemos participated in person at the WHA 2023, in May in Geneva. In addition to networking with civil society, we shared our statement on the HLM on PPPR with several Member State delegates (Ghana, Netherlands, Finland, Nigeria), non-state actors and WHO staff. - Wemos did not organize a side event on PPPR during the WHA. An INB Bureau text for the next meeting on the Pandemic Accord was released during the week of the WHA and we will prepare inputs on that. During the WHA week, we have networked with other civil society experts on F4H . An online meeting with a small group of experts is planned to take place June 14th to discuss our positions on F4PPPR and try to elaborate a proposed position on which to collect broad CS support. Participation in G2H2 INB WG has slowed down a bit lately. Wemos provided input on Finance for PPPR in the analysis made by the Civil Society Alliance on Human Rights in the Treaty, which is consolidated in a google doc and widely shared with civil society for use in advocacy. - Wemos had a meeting with CCG Kenya to update them on the ... ACT-A will not be continued after 2022, but in 2023 we focus our advocacy activities on the WHO instrument on Pandemic Preparedness and Response The full target value is reported by Wemos, but naturally other consortium partners, and collaborating partners, will be contributing to this result. The whole story behind this contribution will be explained comprehensively in our narrative reporting and in the descriptive information that will be added to the actual results. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: 2023 Q3/Q4: 1. In October, following the release of a new draft of the WHO Pandemic Accord by the the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Bureau, Wemos published a short blog commentary highlighting our positions and perceived shortcomings. 2. Wemos also collaborated with Simon Reid-Henry (Public Interest and Research Institute, Oslo) on an opinion piece calling for adequate and fair financing for pandemic preparedness and response within the broader context of global health financing. 2024: 3. Give inputs on fair financing for Pandemic PPR to the Dutch delegates engaged in Pandemic Accord negotiations: shared our assessment of the April 2024 text with the Dutch delegates. Additionally Wemos wrote and published a Q&A on the pandemic accord for MPs to provide clarity and counter misinformation. 4. Together with Society for International Developent (SID), Wemos co-organised a G2H2 roundtable and a press conference on Financing in the Pandemic Accord on 12 March in Geneva; Wemos also attended the 12th session of INB in Geneva, We made a statements during the sessions and engaged with delegates before, during and after the meeting about our text suggestions. We wrote an essay for Geneva Health Files that was published on October 22nd and was among the 15 best read pieces of GHF in 2024. Together with the G2H2 INB working group Wemos submitted a statement on fair financing in the pandemic accord to the INB. We reached out to the INB WG, and had a meeting on the 2nd of September to discuss the upcoming INB11. Wemos participated in INB11 as G2H2 representative to talk to delegates about the financing paragraphs, in the lead up to INB12. G2H2 statement was on agenda for INB12. Wemos aligned with the G2H2 working group on the pandemic agreement, on a statement made in the second week of INB12. 5. Discussion on PPPR in weekly DGHA meeting in Q1 2024. Wemos partnered with Health Action International and Medecins Sans Frontieres to shar ... ​ With 'Changes of the EAC SRH Bill' we mean: Explicit mention of types of disability, gender, sexual orientation; having bold language that reflects the SRHR issues of EAC youth; including funding provisions for the Bill At least one of the changes should happen to count an advocacy activity successful Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 3: - SCS031 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level Baseline not needed, analysis of the EAC Bill included in the context analysis. The EAC SRH Bill 2021 is an SRHR policy that seeks to ensure that all people can access SRHR. If this Bill is passed it will operationalize existing country level laws on SRHR. As an instrument of the EAC, provisions in the Bill cannot contradict provisions made in partner states’ constitutions. The Bill is very youth focused and makes most of its provisions for adolescents and young persons. Provisions include access to SRHR information and services for young people without parental consent, CSE, SRHR for adolescents with disabilities, provisions for consensual sexual acts between young people (this is mostly criminalized in partner states), provisions on safe termination of pregnancy and surrogacy (this would be the first law in East Africa to legislate on this). Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 21-04-2023: 2022 progress update: No developments on our expected outcome. The EAC SRH Bill, 2021 was not passed and the EALA parliament dissolved, and new members were elected in the 4th quarter of 2022. The new members of the parliament will be in sworn in the 1st quarter of 2023. All bills include the EAC SRH bill and the committee reports will be voted on to be saved when they resume. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: As of Dec 2024, the bill is still with the General Purpose Committee; It was saved in 2023/2024 when the new parliament was inaugurated. It is still on hold because we need a new round of public hearings and funding remains a major concern. Additionally, critical clauses have been changed so this is still being discussed. Nothing is changed in 2024. It includes all advocacy activities, either they are successful or not ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 4: - SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency Analysis of the EAC Bill included in the context analysis. The EAC SRH Bill 2021 is an SRHR policy that seeks to ensure that all people can access SRHR. If this Bill is passed it will operationalize existing country level laws on SRHR. As an instrument of the EAC, provisions in the Bill cannot contradict provisions made in partner states’ constitutions. The Bill is very youth focused and makes most of its provisions for adolescents and young persons. Provisions include access to SRHR information and services for young people without parental consent, CSE, SRHR for adolescents with disabilities, provisions for consensual sexual acts between young people (this is mostly criminalized in partner states), provisions on safe termination of pregnancy and surrogacy (this would be the first law in East Africa to legislate on this). Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 21-04-2023: 2022 progress update: One of our collaborating partners organised public hearings around the EAC SRH Bill 2021. We provided financial support for the hearing that took place in Kigali, Rwanda, on June 29th. Our partner selected Rwanda based on the financial needs of each country. (activity counted as Wemos because of the small grant provision) Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: Contributed to high level engagement meetings with EALA members: From 15th to 17th November 2023, AMwA contributed to deepening EALA MPs’ understanding of the EAC SRH Bill. The workshop was organised by EANNASO with support from and other partners, in Kigali, Rwanda. 21 EALA MPs who are members of the General Purpose Committee and 15 strategic partners drawn from the EAC Health secretariat, EALA secretariat, CSOs, religious leaders, health experts, legal experts, media and youth and adolescents (rights holders) from the 7 EAC member states attended the workshop. The engagement increased the knowledge of new EALA MPs, amplified the voices of adolescents and youth and provide information on the anti-rights resistance to the bill within EALA. By changes in agenda-setting we mean that countries include the East and Southern Africa (ESA) commitments in their political agendas and recommit to them By more inclusive we mean that countries (re)commit to the ESA commitments, with all their new revised targets, which are more inclusive in terms of minoritised people At least one of the changes should happen to count an advocacy activity successful ​ Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to MFA SCS 3: - SCS031 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level Adding information on ESA commitment revised targets and country-specific commitments to the analysis included in the context analysis. The first East and Southern Africa (ESA) Ministerial Commitments were adopted by ESA ministries in 2013. All Make Way Countries have signed it. The Commitments include a good quality CSE curriculum in place and implemented, SRH and CSE training for teachers, health and social workers, youth-friendly SRH services, and elimination of GBV, early and unintended pregnancies and child marriage. The commitment was framed within the context of existing regional and global commitments on education, health and human rights. In December 2021 there was a high-level meeting of the Ministers of Education. Zambia and Rwanda have already recommitted to the ESA Commitments during 2021. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: FAWE was invited to join the drafting committee reviewing the Continental Education Strategy for Africa (CESA) and making recommendations on the CESA post-2025. Among its calls to action during the girls' conference, FAWE called on the AU member states to use the Gender Equality strategy for CESA (GES4CESA), which FAWE developed in partnership with the African Union, and AU/CIEFFA (African Union International Centre for the Education of Girls and Women in Africa), to review progress made towards gender mainstreaming in education. It includes all advocacy activities, either they are successful or not Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 4: - SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency Adding information on ESA commitment revised targets and country-specific commitments to the analysis included in the context analysis. The first East and Southern Africa (ESA) Ministerial Commitments were adopted by ESA ministries in 2013. All Make Way Countries have signed it. The Commitments include a good quality CSE curriculum in place and implemented, SRH and CSE training for teachers, health and social workers, youth-friendly SRH services, and elimination of GBV, early and unintended pregnancies and child marriage. The commitment was framed within the context of existing regional and global commitments on education, health and human rights. In December 2021 there was a high-level meeting of the Ministers of Education. Zambia and Rwanda have already recommitted to the ESA Commitments during 2021. Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 21-04-2023: 2022 progress update: One of our collaborating partners in Rwanda, with support from the RGCG, facilitated discussions by convening a consultation meeting that brought together policy makers from different concerned government institutions NGOs, right holders, adolescents and young people. It was an opportunity to discuss the current progress, challenges and opportunities for further meaningful engagement on new CSE and SRHR programming can be strengthened in Rwanda. The objective of the meeting was to push the government to recommit to the ESA ministerial commitments. (this activity is counted under Wemos because of the small grant provision) Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: In 2023Q4: • The CCG engaged UNESCO in Zambia, the CPs and Youth Panel members were taken through the Regional Accountability Framework for ESA-CSE Commitment and some of the targets were incorporated in the 2024 CCG workplan. UNESCO and FAWE partnered in an abstract titled "Let's Talk! A campaign to address early and unintended pregnancies in East & Southern Africa that was presented during the International Girls Conference held in Nairobi, Kenya on 21st and 22nd November 2023. (continued initiative- reported in MT) 2024: 1. FAWE as the GIMAC thematic lead in education convened a meeting during the 40th GIMAC pre-summit consultative meeting on gender mainstreaming in the AU between 13th to 15th February 2024. 2. FAWE Participated in the first-ever pan-African conference on girls’ education in Addis, Ababa Ethiopia between July 2-5, 2024. Some of the panels where FAWE was represented included gender-responsive education financing, school-related gender-based violence, and supporting adolescent mothers to return to school and access Comprehensive Sexuality Education, among others. FAWE recommendations included the need for the implementation of policies that safeguard girls from SRGBV, re-entry policies, and gender-responsive curricula, among others. 3. FAWE has continued its advocacy work towards the review of Continental Education Strategy for Africa (CESA) 2016–2025. As the co-leads for the girls' and women’s education Cluster at the African Union, FAWE was invited to join the drafting committee reviewing the CESA strategy and making recommendations on the CESA post-2025. Among its calls to action during the girls' conference, FAWE called on the AU member states to use the Gender Equality strategy for CESA (GES4CESA), which FAWE developed in partnership with the African Union, and AUCIEFFA, to review progress made towards gender mainstreaming in education. The link to the survey will be shared with the team for them to particip ... By improvements we mean: changes in the participation (more inclusive) and improved language (more intersectional), policies influenced, CCGs/collaborating partners participating in regional processes. At least one of the changes should happen to count an advocacy activity successful. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 3: - SCS031 # of times that CSOs succeed in creating space for CSO demands and positions through agenda setting, influencing the debate and/or creating space to engage at national and international level The type of mechanisms we are considering are the following: - African Regional Forum on the SDGs - report of the Africa Goodwill Ambassador to the African Union - reporting of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 17-01-2024: In 2023: - Wemos has contributed to changes. E.g. a change in the UN declaration on UHC (zero draft), to which Wemos has contributed to. This discource change is not attributable to Wemos only, but we believe that our advocacy contributed to that change. E.g. the summaries of the multistakeholder Hearing with the President of the UNGA and civil society input through UHC2030 in which Wemos actively participated, very clearly reflect the importance of public finance and equitable access. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: *Wemos provided feedback on specific paragraphs 2nd revision of the Political Declaration on UHC (including a red flag concerning the leveraging of private finance to fill finance gaps) to the Dutch government. This paragraph on private finance was eventually removed from the declaration. It includes all advocacy activities, either they are successful or not. Reporting at BL, ML, and EL. Reporting on unique values (counting once). ​ Links to SCS 4: - SCS041 # of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSOs, for, by or with their membership/constituency The type of mechanisms we are considering are the following: - African Regional Forum on the SDGs - report of the Africa Goodwill Ambassador to the African Union - reporting of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 17-01-2024: In 2023: -Wemos participated in the multistakeholder hearings with the UNGA president in preparation of the UN high-level meetings on UHC and PPPR. These took place in New York, 9th of May. Wemos, also on behalf of AMwA, delivered a statement urging states to prioritize equitable access to health by increasing public finance, expanding fiscal space, and advancing health financing policies that are deliberately aimed at equity. Barbara also disseminated this statement to around 20 country delegates at the WHA (21-26 May) , to non-state actors and during a side event on "leaving no one behind and health financing (25 May). - Wemos participated at the 5th Global Forum on Human Resources for Health and, with other CSOs engaged with the WHO and co-developed action briefs, ahead of the Forum. On the 18/05, Wemos participated at a post-Forum meeting with the WHO. Other consortium partner organisations have targets and will report on actuals for this indicator. Reporting 3 Times Unique (target for the full programme; actual MTR and actual End of Programme). Target has been set for the whole programme period. Reporting on actual values will be done at mid-term and end-term. 30-04-2025: Progress update: In 2023 Q3/Q4 • VSO and LF co-organized the 20-year jubilee event of Global Campaign for Education (GCE) Netherlands with a range of NGOs present, highlighting the interlinkages between SDG4 (Quality Education) and other SDGs (Gender Equality, Health, and Reduced Inequalities), with CSE emphasized as a key component—insights to be shared with the NL MFA Education team. • Participate in the High Level Meeting UHC & SDG Summit 2023, NY: - .Wemos provided feedback on specific paragraphs 2nd revision of the Political Declaration on UHC (including a red flag concerning the leveraging of private finance to fill finance gaps) to the Dutch government. This paragraph on private finance was eventually removed from the declaration. • Follow-up Make Way webinar to discuss/assess the final drafts of the political declarations of the SDG Summit and the High Level Meeting (HLM) on UHC. AMwA and Wemos organised a hybrid side event in New York (UN Church Center) "Accelerating progress towards health equity", on the 19th of September • Wemos, also in part of AMwA, participated in designated session of the HLM on UHC and delivered a 2-minute speech. • Wemos and AMwA pariticipated at the Annual Meetings and civil society policy forum in person, in Marrakesh. Organised a session for the WB-IMF 2023 CSPF in Marrakesh (Development Finance to for-profit Private Healthcare: What Implications for UHC, Human Rights and Gender Equality).(article) • Promote ratification of the "African Disability Protocol": LF offering technical support in Zambia, started co-creation group on African Diability Forum (ADF), planned joint learning sessions amongst CCGs. Continued work in the ADP working group. This inititiave continued in 2024 as well. LF continued collaborating with country teams for awareness raising and advocacy activities around the Africa Disability Protocol in 2024. In 2024: • Participate in CSW 68: The Make Way team participated in CSW68, attending ses ... By 'Make Way CSO allies' we mean: CSOs beyond Make Way consortium partners and Make Way collaborating partners. By 'take up intersectionality approach' means to use our SRHR toolkit and/or use intersectionality in their discourse. ​ Reporting annually, on reach values. ​ Links to SCS 8: - SCS083 # of CSOs (not youth led or women led) using a Gender and Social inclusion lens during all phases of the programming cycle with specific attention to youth. Baseline information to be collected in 2023. Baseline to be set in 2023. 21-04-2023: No new allies yet. Baseline to be set in 2023. 29-04-2024: Make Way Regional and Global worked with the SRHR+ platform to organise election debate on 3 Oct in the run up to the Dutch general elections. This was joint initiative of LF, VSO and Wemos with SRHR+ platform, but we have reported actuals under LF to avoid double counting. In addition, several trainings/sessions were organised by consortium partners to demonstrate CSOs how to use the SRHR toolkit for intersectional SRHR advocacy in 2023. Actuals for this indicator will be reported in 2024 after doing follow up with CSO allies. The target is established with the expectation that each consortium partner would work collaboratively with their respective counterparts to become allies who adopt the intersectionality approach in their SRHR advocacy efforts. Total 20 CSOs allies will be targeted in 2024. 30-04-2025: In 2024, RGCG partners continued implementing intersectional SRHR advocacy initiatives in collaboration with several CSO allies at both regional and global levels. RGCG partners are also actively engaged in various advocacy alliances, network and working groups, and engage with more CSO allies on intersectional SRHR advocacy through these connections. CSO allies also joined the session that we organised around intersectionality and use of internsectional tools for lobby and advocacy. For example, Regional Global Youth panel mebers also organised the webinar series 2024. The topics covered were: meaning and practice of intersectionality, the Make Way SRHR Toolkit best practices, online and offline SRHR advocacy, and promoting youth engagement and participation in advocacy spaces. Nine organisations attended the webinar series. Wemos Technical partner in Kenya, also organised session on use of Budget analysis checklist in 4 counties in Kenya. RGCG plans to continue implementing intersectional SRHR advocacy initiatives in collaboration with several CSO allies at both regional and global levels. RGCG partners are also actively engaged in various advocacy groups/network, and will engage with more CSO allies on intersectional SRHR advocacy through these connections. NL-KVK-41201644-10314 Wemos Foundation Wemos Make Way Make Way, embracing intersectionality for health equity & justice. The Make Way programme (2021-2025) (previously 'the Intersectionality Consortium') aims to ensure youth in all their diversity can fully realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). We promote an intersectional approach to addressing SRHR issues. This means making overlapping vulnerabilities visible to understand their effects on people’s SRHR. We develop innovative tools and build capacities of other civil society organisations to advocate the needed policy and societal changes. Our partnership consists of Akina Mama wa Afrika, The Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians, Forum for African Women Educationalists, Liliane Foundation, VSO Netherlands, and Wemos, and we work in partnership with the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Wemos is budget holder and coordinating organisation of the Make Way consortium. We implement Make Way in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, and at the Eastern and Southern African region and global level. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation Akvo Foundation Wemos Renée Bouhuijs PMEL coordinator renee.bouhuijs@wemos.nl https://www.wemos.nl/en/ Ellermanstraat 15-O 1114 AK Amsterdam-Duivendrecht -1.2920659 36.8219462 8.9806034 38.7577605 -1.9440727 30.0618851 0.3475964 32.5825197 -15.3875259 28.3228165 1158977.00 1775000.00 1883389.00 1724619.00 1470807.00 7692460.00 Contractual commitment between Wemos as lead and Wemos as implementing partner (including PCU) to provide the specified amount of funds, for the Make Way programme implementation. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 1424838.00 1st 'disbursement', by Wemos as budget holder / recipient organisation from DGIS, to Wemos for the implementation of the Make Way programme and for the budget of the Programme Coordination Unit. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 825379.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Rwanda, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 825379.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Kenya, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 825383.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Ethiopia, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 825383.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Uganda, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 825378.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Zambia, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 3565558.00 Amount that Wemos commits for Make Way Regional-Global context, 5 years. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 1690922.00 2nd 'disbursement', by Wemos as budget holder / recipient organisation from DGIS, to Wemos for the implementation of the Make Way programme and for the budget of the Programme Coordination Unit. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 1700093.00 3rd 'disbursement', by Wemos as budget holder / recipient organisation from DGIS, to Wemos for the implementation of the Make Way programme and for the budget of the Programme Coordination Unit. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 1370939.00 4th 'disbursement', by Wemos as budget holder / recipient organisation from DGIS, to Wemos for the implementation of the Make Way programme and for the budget of the Programme Coordination Unit. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation NL-KVK-41201644-10275 Wemos Foundation Make Way programme results framework - MFA Make Way, embracing intersectionality for health equity & justice. The Make Way programme (2021-2025) (previously 'the Intersectionality Consortium') aims to ensure youth in all their diversity can fully realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). We promote an intersectional approach to addressing SRHR issues. This means making overlapping vulnerabilities visible to understand their effects on people’s SRHR. We develop innovative tools and build capacities of other civil society organisations to advocate the needed policy and societal changes. Our partnership consists of Akina Mama wa Afrika, The Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians, Forum for African Women Educationalists, Liliane Foundation, VSO Netherlands, and Wemos, and we work in partnership with the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. We implement Make Way in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, and at the Eastern and Southern African region and global level. Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs Akina Mama wa Afrika Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands Liliane Fonds Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya) Akvo Foundation Wemos Jennifer Bushee Make Way Consortium Programme Coordinator +3173 518 9420 jennifer.bushee@wemos.nl https://www.wemos.nl/ Ellermanstraat 15-O 1114 AK Amsterdam-Duivendrecht Wemos Renée Bouhuijs PMEL coordinator renee.bouhuijs@wemos.nl https://www.wemos.nl/ Ellermanstraat 15-O 1114 AK Amsterdam-Duivendrecht -0.023559 37.906193 9.145000000000001 40.489673 -1.940278 29.873888 1.373333 32.290275 -13.133897 27.849332 3712867.00 6657999.00 6293132.00 6293132.00 4422201.00 27379331.00 Total commitment from the NL MFA to Wemos, as penholder of the Make Way consortium, to implement the Make Way programme from 2021-2025. Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs Wemos Foundation 5018406.00 First instalment for the Make Way programme, made from the NL MFA to Wemos. Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs Wemos Foundation 5421426.00 Contractual commitment between Wemos and Liliane Foundation to provide the specified amount of funds, for the Make Way programme implementation. Wemos Foundation Liliane Fonds 2791554.00 Contractual commitment between Wemos and Akina Mama wa Afrika to provide the specified amount of funds, for the Make Way programme implementation. Wemos Foundation Akina Mama wa Afrika 8374889.00 Contractual commitment between Wemos and VSO Netherlands to provide the specified amount of funds, for the Make Way programme implementation. This includes funds for the implementation by the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians. Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands 7692460.00 Contractual commitment between Wemos as budget holder, to Wemos for the implementation of Make Way and for the budget of the Programme Coordination Unit, to provide the specified amount of funds. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 1042483.00 1st disbursement, by Wemos to Liliane Foundation, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Liliane Fonds 470992.00 1st disbursement, by Wemos to Akina Mama wa Afrika, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Akina Mama wa Afrika 585781.00 1st disbursement, by Wemos to Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya) 1494312.00 1st disbursement, by Wemos to VSO Netherlands, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. This includes funds for the implementation by the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians. Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands 1424838.00 1st disbursement, by Wemos as budget holder / recipient organisation from DGIS, to Wemos for the implementation of the Make Way programme and for the budget of the Programme Coordination Unit. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 3099001.00 Contractual commitment between Wemos and FAWE to provide the specified amount of funds, for the Make Way programme implementation. Wemos Foundation Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya) 5352460.00 Second instalment for the Make Way programme, made from the NL MFA to Wemos. Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs Wemos Foundation 405385.00 2nd disbursement, by Wemos to Liliane Foundation, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Liliane Fonds 409106.00 3rd disbursement, by Wemos to Liliane Foundation, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Liliane Fonds 983684.00 2nd disbursement, by Wemos to VSO Netherlands, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. This includes funds for the implementation by the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians. Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands 554706.00 3rd disbursement, by Wemos to VSO Netherlands, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. This includes funds for the implementation by the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians. Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands 348647.00 2nd disbursement, by Wemos to Akina Mama wa Afrika, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Akina Mama wa Afrika 206048.00 3rd disbursement, by Wemos to Akina Mama wa Afrika, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Akina Mama wa Afrika 420716.00 2nd disbursement, by Wemos to Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya) 235608.00 3rd disbursement, by Wemos to Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya) 1690922.00 2nd disbursement, by Wemos as budget holder / recipient organisation from DGIS, to Wemos for the implementation of the Make Way programme and for the budget of the Programme Coordination Unit. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 5696785.00 Third instalment for the Make Way programme, made from the NL MFA to Wemos. Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs Wemos Foundation 907975.00 4th disbursement, by Wemos to Liliane Foundation, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Liliane Fonds 1176402.00 4th disbursement, by Wemos to VSO Netherlands, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. This includes funds for the implementation by the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians. Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands 415932.00 4th disbursement, by Wemos to Akina Mama wa Afrika, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Akina Mama wa Afrika 475900.00 4th disbursement, by Wemos to Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya) 6122502.00 Fourth instalment for the Make Way programme, made from the NL MFA to Wemos. Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs Wemos Foundation 50000.00 5th disbursement, by Wemos to Liliane Foundation, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Liliane Fonds 100000.00 5th disbursement, by Wemos to VSO Netherlands, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. This includes funds for the implementation by the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians. Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands 50000.00 5th disbursement, by Wemos to Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya) 1700093.00 3rd disbursement, by Wemos as budget holder / recipient organisation from DGIS, to Wemos for the implementation of the Make Way programme and for the budget of the Programme Coordination Unit. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 50000.00 5th disbursement, by Wemos to Akina Mama wa Afrika, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Akina Mama wa Afrika 270352.00 6th disbursement, by Wemos to Liliane Foundation, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Liliane Fonds 250392.00 6th disbursement, by Wemos to VSO Netherlands, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. This includes funds for the implementation by the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians. Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands 176562.00 6th disbursement, by Wemos to Akina Mama wa Afrika, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Akina Mama wa Afrika 73717.00 6th disbursement, by Wemos to Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya) 150000.00 7th disbursement, by Wemos to Liliane Foundation, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Liliane Fonds 300000.00 7th disbursement, by Wemos to VSO Netherlands, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. This includes funds, €150,000, for the implementation by the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians. Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands 150000.00 7th disbursement, by Wemos to Akina Mama wa Afrika, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Akina Mama wa Afrika 150000.00 7th disbursement, by Wemos to Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya) 715121.00 8th disbursement, by Wemos to Liliane Foundation, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Liliane Fonds 1299921.00 8th disbursement, by Wemos to VSO Netherlands, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. This includes funds, €432,462, for the implementation by the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians. Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands 346211.00 8th disbursement, by Wemos to Akina Mama wa Afrika, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Akina Mama wa Afrika 349361.00 8th disbursement, by Wemos to Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya) 1370939.00 4th disbursement, by Wemos as budget holder / recipient organisation from DGIS, to Wemos for the implementation of the Make Way programme and for the budget of the Programme Coordination Unit. Wemos Foundation Wemos Foundation 4915385.00 Fifth instalment for the Make Way programme, made from the NL MFA to Wemos. Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs Wemos Foundation 297295.00 9th disbursement, by Wemos to Liliane Foundation, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Liliane Fonds 592959.00 9th disbursement, by Wemos to VSO Netherlands, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. This includes funds, €432,462, for the implementation by the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians. Wemos Foundation VSO Netherlands 188387.00 9th disbursement, by Wemos to Akina Mama wa Afrika, for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Akina Mama wa Afrika 212310.00 9th disbursement, by Wemos to Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), for the implementation of the Make Way programme. Wemos Foundation Forum for African Women Educationalists (Kenya)